Re: [core] yang-cbor and core-sid comments

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 15 May 2019 22:08 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57F59120221 for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 May 2019 15:08:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SiUMt0UQ2NLN for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 May 2019 15:08:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5022412001B for <core@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 May 2019 15:08:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E5EC38271; Wed, 15 May 2019 18:07:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id BE5B4E3B; Wed, 15 May 2019 18:08:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBF05A5; Wed, 15 May 2019 18:08:26 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Michel Veillette <Michel.Veillette@trilliant.com>
cc: "core@ietf.org" <core@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <BL0PR06MB50428E48A16503AB6834FBB49A090@BL0PR06MB5042.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
References: <4502.1557948899@localhost> <BL0PR06MB50428E48A16503AB6834FBB49A090@BL0PR06MB5042.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 18:08:26 -0400
Message-ID: <15512.1557958106@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/SWZwMpQEBEeEH_h8a1B9VLoURF8>
Subject: Re: [core] yang-cbor and core-sid comments
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 22:08:37 -0000

Michel Veillette <Michel.Veillette@trilliant.com> wrote:
    > About "Given that the 3rd party registries are now out of scope."

Hmm. I thought I understood that from one of the slides.
   https://youtu.be/2EP-qms-IEU?t=5245

I thought it said that on slide "SID changes in future v06"
Looking again... seems I misunderstood!

I still don't know what will happen to comi.space allocated ranges.

Sorry for confusion!

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-