Re: minor point

Frank Kastenholz <kasten@ftp.com> Mon, 28 December 1992 15:43 UTC

Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 10:40:35 -0500
Message-Id: <9212281540.AA22929@ftp.com>
To: dee@skidrow.ljo.dec.com
Subject: Re: minor point
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Frank Kastenholz <kasten@ftp.com>
Reply-To: kasten@ftp.com
Cc: Evaluating the Next Generation <criteria@ftp.com>

Donald,

I am not sure that this is necessary. I do not believe that everyone will
change to IPv7 all at once. It would be a gradual process and you would
apply for your IPv7 address when you want to change over.

 > Possibly a sub-item under ease of administration or the like: as
 > mandated in the IAB draft, any IPv7 address scheme needs to have all
 > of the IPv4 address space embedded in it so everyone does't have to
 > apply for new numbers all at once.


--
Frank Kastenholz

minor point Beast (Donald E. Eastlake, 3rd)
Re: minor point Frank Kastenholz
Re: minor point huston
Re: minor point Beast (Donald E. Eastlake, 3rd)
Re: minor point Beast (Donald E. Eastlake, 3rd)
Re: minor point Frank Kastenholz
Re: minor point Paul Tsuchiya