IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dane] An AD bit discussion

Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Wed, 26 February 2014 21:26 UTC

Return-Path: <marka@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 911A61A06BC for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 13:26:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0ElD4Cju1Vac for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 13:26:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ams1.isc.org (mx.ams1.isc.org [199.6.1.65]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9B0F1A0713 for <dane@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 13:25:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) by mx.ams1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CDBA238400; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 21:25:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marka@isc.org)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81B2216005C; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 21:26:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rock.dv.isc.org (c211-30-183-50.carlnfd1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.30.183.50]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5315916004A; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 21:26:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rock.dv.isc.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rock.dv.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26889106C669; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:25:40 +1100 (EST)
To: Andreas Schulze <sca@andreasschulze.de>
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
References: <alpine.LFD.2.10.1402260845520.3528@bofh.nohats.ca> <20140226194208.GA19694@solar.andreasschulze.de>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 26 Feb 2014 20:42:09 +0100." <20140226194208.GA19694@solar.andreasschulze.de>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:25:40 +1100
Message-Id: <20140226212540.26889106C669@rock.dv.isc.org>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/__0yqI9QfOHuBjg4Q-g3jYi50Ng
Cc: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, dane WG list <dane@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dane] An AD bit discussion
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 21:26:08 -0000

The history of the AD bit in responses and it meaning.

RFC 1035 -> AD=0
RFC 2535 -> AD=0/1 (records gone through validation) 
RCC 3225 (DO introduced)
RFC 3655 -> AD=0/1 (DO=1 required, answer and authority sections all secure)
RFC 3755 (type code roll)
RFC 4035 -> AD=0/1 (DO=1 required, answer and authority sections all secure)
RFC 6840 -> AD=0/1 (DO=1 or AD=1 required, answer and authority sections all
		    secure)

-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka@isc.org

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email