Re: [dane] An AD bit discussion

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sat, 01 March 2014 01:48 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5477E1A03A1 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 17:48:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.569
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.569 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RU_vvcX5HFqL for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 17:48:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [IPv6:2a01:7e00::f03c:91ff:feae:de77]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AE051A0389 for <dane@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 17:48:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (CPE001b2128d5c4-CM185933427c47.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [99.240.152.175]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 146492207A for <dane@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 20:48:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (quigon.sandelman.ca [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D388CA0D7 for <dane@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 20:48:49 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
cc: dane WG list <dane@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <912.1393614300@sandelman.ca>
References: <alpine.LFD.2.10.1402260845520.3528@bofh.nohats.ca> <912.1393614300@sandelman.ca>
Comments: In-reply-to Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> message dated "Fri, 28 Feb 2014 14:05:00 -0500."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3; GNU Emacs 23.4.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 20:48:49 -0500
Message-ID: <16661.1393638529@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/ai_045857tSZVC8_wlzFu98ACJA
Subject: Re: [dane] An AD bit discussion
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2014 01:48:53 -0000

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>; wrote:
    > If it fails to validate because the data is correct, I expect the bad

should read;
    > If it fails to validate because the data is corrupt, I expect the bad


-- 
Michael Richardson
-on the road-