Re: [Dart] draft-dart-dscp-rtp - way forward

"Black, David" <david.black@emc.com> Thu, 28 August 2014 20:17 UTC

Return-Path: <david.black@emc.com>
X-Original-To: dart@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dart@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F5421A89B5 for <dart@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 13:17:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.969
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.969 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RigQFoV8fGjx for <dart@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 13:17:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailuogwhop.emc.com (mailuogwhop.emc.com [168.159.213.141]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 802951A89C7 for <dart@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 13:16:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from maildlpprd04.lss.emc.com (maildlpprd04.lss.emc.com [10.253.24.36]) by mailuogwprd03.lss.emc.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0) with ESMTP id s7SKGcg3025541 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 28 Aug 2014 16:16:40 -0400
X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 mailuogwprd03.lss.emc.com s7SKGcg3025541
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=emc.com; s=jan2013; t=1409257000; bh=mEBbCEGGYrn1QJQ4AxeYPbLER54=; h=From:To:CC:Date:Subject:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=vv2bT/+TkxIYZzb9+ZbuGUJjw2kg+TJcPe05FN6X7pEi6r9jsFsutXYE/YgH66EQI qtc+8EXOXNi2vuo2/DE3rQh3+/DJbZt5Zi7Cm5JkRn02HJ/qaODpZtgU7gjYoZkw/9 lvPNhGsCGGp/eO5qaAp4KqKJhGQQ9nbVVaOcHp0M=
X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 mailuogwprd03.lss.emc.com s7SKGcg3025541
Received: from mailusrhubprd53.lss.emc.com (mailusrhubprd53.lss.emc.com [10.106.48.18]) by maildlpprd04.lss.emc.com (RSA Interceptor); Thu, 28 Aug 2014 16:16:13 -0400
Received: from mxhub24.corp.emc.com (mxhub24.corp.emc.com [128.222.70.136]) by mailusrhubprd53.lss.emc.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0) with ESMTP id s7SKDgFV031008 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 28 Aug 2014 16:16:21 -0400
Received: from mx15a.corp.emc.com ([169.254.1.175]) by mxhub24.corp.emc.com ([128.222.70.136]) with mapi; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 16:15:38 -0400
From: "Black, David" <david.black@emc.com>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 16:15:36 -0400
Thread-Topic: [Dart] draft-dart-dscp-rtp - way forward
Thread-Index: Ac/C+Hxgwhy1/rSZRsSes7ES854AwQAA/3dQ
Message-ID: <8D3D17ACE214DC429325B2B98F3AE712077BC66841@MX15A.corp.emc.com>
References: <8D3D17ACE214DC429325B2B98F3AE712077BC667DE@MX15A.corp.emc.com> <2B82DD06-83A4-4710-B614-16F5351A0A7F@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <2B82DD06-83A4-4710-B614-16F5351A0A7F@nostrum.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Sentrion-Hostname: mailusrhubprd53.lss.emc.com
X-RSA-Classifications: public
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dart/TT_4RyE5ebM27cFULfN34XEVcWI
Cc: "dart@ietf.org" <dart@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Dart] draft-dart-dscp-rtp - way forward
X-BeenThere: dart@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"DiffServ Applied to RTP Transports discussion list\"" <dart.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dart>, <mailto:dart-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dart/>
List-Post: <mailto:dart@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dart-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dart>, <mailto:dart-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 20:17:09 -0000

> If we think we can close this as not a real issue (or at least not an issue we
> plan to address), but there's some risk it might come back up at IETF LC, then
> that's fine. But if we are saying there is an open issue that needs closure,
> but we can close it during IETF last call, then I have reservations. The
> version that goes to IETF LC should be one that the working group believes to
> be as complete is it's going to get.

In private discussion, both Harald and I favored saying less (rather than more)
about RMCAT in this DART draft.  For that reason I think "at least not
an issue we plan to address" is a valid characterization of this item.

Thanks,
--David

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben Campbell [mailto:ben@nostrum.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 3:44 PM
> To: Black, David; Harald Tveit Alvestrand
> Cc: dart@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Dart] draft-dart-dscp-rtp - way forward
> 
> (as chair)
> 
> On Aug 28, 2014, at 1:12 PM, Black, David <david.black@emc.com>; wrote:
> 
> > [E] Open issue: Harald Alvestrand's concerns about "differential treatment"
> > wrt Section 5.1 .  I don't completely understand these concerns, and suspect
> > that they may require an email discussion across the DART and RMCAT WGs
> > to sort through.
> >
> > --> Deferred - Harald wanted to think about this, and I've seen nothing
> > --> further.  I'd suggest that IETF Last Call as an appropriate opportunity
> > --> to share any further thoughts, so I don't think there's anything to be
> done
> > --> about this now.
> 
> I have mixed feelings on this.
> 
> If we think we can close this as not a real issue (or at least not an issue we
> plan to address), but there's some risk it might come back up at IETF LC, then
> that's fine. But if we are saying there is an open issue that needs closure,
> but we can close it during IETF last call, then I have reservations. The
> version that goes to IETF LC should be one that the working group believes to
> be as complete is it's going to get.
> 
> David, thoughts?
> 
> Harald, do you care to comment further?