IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Detnet] Resolving the remaining Use Cases Draft Comments - Cellular Radio and Industrial M2M

János Farkas <janos.farkas@ericsson.com> Tue, 18 December 2018 16:21 UTC

Return-Path: <Janos.Farkas@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA1DF130F08 for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 08:21:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.464
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.464 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.065, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ericsson.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AOQCz_ARErSx for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 08:21:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sessmg23.ericsson.net (sessmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7879A130EFF for <detnet@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 08:21:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=ericsson.com; s=mailgw201801; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i=@ericsson.com; t=1545150069; x=1547742069; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:CC:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=eqlN8A/KbPaEDS0l4/wrAhVSTMAFyEepk1Z8qUTSsiM=; b=d6pcEYwyVxTItNsUDMEXVkS2vCK7PmYrWUw8zkJqR3QTgJiXaQaowKJJAyah7Fcg e6DRbzFKLkxSQAR2vWhcA+BqqPAFOeH0FdNF4Mg+yKBoUM5oYM9ijb3LEnJNTAx/ IReHhgDG4RRC10t0S8/T7j5JXC9JWAcWd8Az1Xdw3WE=;
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-2198b9e00000062f-04-5c191e757f47
Received: from ESESSMB501.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.119]) by sessmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 5B.F7.01583.57E191C5; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 17:21:09 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ESESBMB501.ericsson.se (153.88.183.168) by ESESSMB501.ericsson.se (153.88.183.162) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1466.3; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 17:21:03 +0100
Received: from [131.160.183.54] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.184) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.1.1466.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 17:21:03 +0100
To: "Grossman, Ethan A." <eagros@dolby.com>
CC: "jouni@gmail.com" <jouni@gmail.com>, "Maik Seewald (maseewal)" <maseewal@cisco.com>, Balázs Varga A <balazs.a.varga@ericsson.com>, "detnet@ietf.org" <detnet@ietf.org>, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
References: <CY1PR0601MB1408FD124CDE12A8B4980100C4A30@CY1PR0601MB1408.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
From: János Farkas <janos.farkas@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <b6817ea0-869a-75e6-218f-c478f485e1d8@ericsson.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 17:21:03 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CY1PR0601MB1408FD124CDE12A8B4980100C4A30@CY1PR0601MB1408.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------9688EB65FB401921A84F34C9"
Content-Language: en-US
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFmpnkeLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42KZGbG9XLdUTjLGYHeXiMXvT7NZLPoeb2e3 +Pb3MZPF5YV72C2ObDjL6sDqMeX3RlaPfROPsHjsnHWX3WPJkp9MASxRXDYpqTmZZalF+nYJ XBmH9t1kKtgjVfHw/Dm2BsZ5ol2MnBwSAiYS93teMoHYQgJHGCWm/lTpYuQCsr8xSjzd3MIO 4RxllNh14ig7SJWwQLLEoc+/2LoYOThEBLQljp+2AAkzC3xglPi0XQNiUILEnd79YEPZBOwl 7l7awAxi8wLZB/d8YQGxWQRUJToe7wYbKSoQK/HpymKoGkGJkzOfsICM5xRIlHgzVQxifJjE 7vNnmSBscYlbT+ZD3awm8entQ/YJjIKzkHTPQtIyC0nLLKCpzEBXPNhaBhGWl2jeOpsZwtaX uH7nPiuy+AJG9lWMosWpxcW56UbGeqlFmcnFxfl5enmpJZsYgdFzcMtv3R2Mq187HmIU4GBU 4uHV5JCMEWJNLCuuzD3EKMHBrCTCe6tUIkaINyWxsiq1KD++qDQntfgQozQHi5I47x8hwRgh gfTEktTs1NSC1CKYLBMHp1QDY0Hymp/Lhd7OOLL6sN9KOdGGBg1VXWWmT7Iaba8bgpS+5SyS 4v4gJ7DGzZLHmWfe+snvuMTcPi2c++vcpYY3Fhv4THb9EojftdHx0dEkJ8934l/C79x99Xfh 1cPJ1eqSJmxfmfQ+HTlkd2e1Xzz/V69T6wSe7/RyeRQaMcHhzU6Vo/+rX82S0lFiKc5INNRi LipOBACoLHg8mgIAAA==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/QCkXs4r5IFbq1MUZ93bKf1n8w38>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] Resolving the remaining Use Cases Draft Comments - Cellular Radio and Industrial M2M
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 16:21:14 -0000

Hi Ethan,

Maybe it is not a god phrase, but the intention with the phrase that the 
loss should be burstless was that consecutive packets should not be lost.
Perhaps the maximum consecutive loss tolerance parameter describes it 
better in 
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-detnet-flow-information-model-02. 
It is the "maximum    number of consecutive packets whose loss can be 
tolerated"

Maybe updating the bullet in the use cases draft to:

"Low packet loss (0.1-1 %, limited number of consecutive packets)"

?

Regards,
Janos

On 12/16/2018 6:03 AM, Grossman, Ethan A. wrote:
>
> *_Balazs, Janos: _*
>
> * Section 7.4
>
> What does burstless mean (especially in the context of low packet loss)?
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email