[dhcwg] An issue for draft-ietf-dhc-relay-port-00
"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Thu, 03 November 2016 21:49 UTC
Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E88A129AB1; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 14:49:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -16.017
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.017 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2BemG_2zfJlB; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 14:49:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26187129974; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 14:49:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7169; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1478209786; x=1479419386; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=v/ECc4cQMk2w0vAT8z30SP2hNqekDN9YOA0gzf6tIJU=; b=VmwkS2TuQFUneVsEliX5COGLGfl35qUqNYzOBfIfeKHvYEeDou4Qbw3Q SsBoVuttUMwkvbslLlyH7DZm5jCXHWkhCeIhtkulRPgYj4DGP7vX+F8xk w9YMH3i6mb2NoiRQrsiIvalWQlOJeFBFp1TSQFDfbGKadAYam/3r7sGvp M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CVAQCDsBtY/4QNJK1dGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBgnM9AQEBAQEfWIEDjTCmL4UYggiIKj8UAQIBAQEBAQEBYiiEaC1eAYEAJgEEARqITrxGAQEBAQEFAQEBAQEBASCPNw6FdgWaIAGQNZARkSABHjdrhR+GMYEvgQwBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,440,1473120000"; d="scan'208,217";a="342109661"
Received: from alln-core-10.cisco.com ([173.36.13.132]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 03 Nov 2016 21:49:45 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (xch-aln-003.cisco.com [173.36.7.13]) by alln-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uA3LnjW5020066 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 3 Nov 2016 21:49:45 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.13) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 16:49:44 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-003.cisco.com ([173.36.7.13]) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com ([173.36.7.13]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 16:49:44 -0500
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-dhc-relay-port@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dhc-relay-port@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: An issue for draft-ietf-dhc-relay-port-00
Thread-Index: AdI2HAj747+qyTZJR2C5yzM05TAWMQ==
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2016 21:49:44 +0000
Message-ID: <cf54c05842f14062a95e77fa8c05107a@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.98.1.203]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_cf54c05842f14062a95e77fa8c05107aXCHALN003ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/S8UeNHKQIWVVNLl3JSnsUfdABp0>
Subject: [dhcwg] An issue for draft-ietf-dhc-relay-port-00
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2016 21:49:47 -0000
Hi: For DHCPv6, we either need to explicitly state that the server MUST copy and add the DHCPv6 Relay Agent Source Port Option when constructing the Relay-Reply chain from the Relay-Forw(s) or the relay must include the ERO option (see RFC 4994) to request that the server echo back this option. For DHCPv4, the entire option 82 is sent back to the relay; but for DHCPv6, only limited relay options are added into the Relay-Reply (just the Interface-Id option is copied per RFC 3315). - Bernie
- [dhcwg] An issue for draft-ietf-dhc-relay-port-00 Bernie Volz (volz)