IETF Logo Mail Archive

[dhcwg] WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security-01 - respond by Nov 9

Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com> Wed, 26 October 2016 19:19 UTC

Return-Path: <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3324F129A5B for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 12:19:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H8X84V62M_HS for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 12:19:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x242.google.com (mail-wm0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 915881298D0 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 12:19:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x242.google.com with SMTP id c17so1917053wmc.3 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 12:19:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=P4xbVrutafjAaYM7ChNrQWQpN71viiGEMZ6mykluMTQ=; b=fvqGWV1QYwQLOpSEbPXVQ8nN1Do09OZdAK1atz3IvIOZ8m+TUDrc/Pd4JWEsQpq4j+ FGpcasiSoFq+OY/1MoHLezLt+Nym5f/7Bo9Vkrh3JYdScYfn90Mu6m5r3UKd9ZFau+ti fT19RvrE44ao+jJrY12hJb5YcizefMPBGKyGHMAQmO7mgQkmRrdDkaDbmk+FHBG2XsRI fk0yDFaW29Fe8ptV2DaG1z8Qob2Z6MYE02L2sXjWpFI6uPSzzRdQNBeXDcWHtH91FZiY 7gpOqvaztJ9OeKJhxseJp34sJ14YNPhVSiChdgzfRm5DcrYY5tz4J6+fTPKJzVe0Z4G/ UQeA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=P4xbVrutafjAaYM7ChNrQWQpN71viiGEMZ6mykluMTQ=; b=cPe1MTrsADEE648DZ4B5nQktY9tmEvi60ifSiJ728+lhva/tQ0v2qOJVayx19KhsLa pkhP+XJHdoVzdA/RqaAAjsMwE4LwK1tVjBS+CsflPd4IVvVasFJghcnQzdVeo0SMR5hD K48FvFHsbpLBkgZ3KEvihQNF0XIEuAX+EcOtWTzPEZjM16c5kmtfZQ5wfMqUch2nXv90 dveTFvaB9YPfC85G0Ap0IkDXQR5b297h1TE8CXyBZXjioDXLfbL6TUye2RbZ+iNoBHDf 8k5m6oji7V1NsiuxTAjMeB23qRNOFvjNKvY0XWfxAaeudE/QXI6oehBAIQ6rIttRh9nc fa/g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvfk5BhfgR0WCvcAjq66OPfQK1odDjuI6VOxL8fP64huZFgDU82krnIN9r1YkkYmZA==
X-Received: by 10.28.224.215 with SMTP id x206mr4346403wmg.77.1477509554134; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 12:19:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.3] ([95.160.150.43]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 63sm12198480wmv.1.2016.10.26.12.19.12 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 26 Oct 2016 12:19:13 -0700 (PDT)
To: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
References: <147671242179.4527.12337010225582460227.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <7e03afc26a08461e8308d5bdf985bed9@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> <ccbfe561da43469e8f894e2235c4b429@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <6a8f5646aedb44b5af85d7a45039eb02@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> <ed09c191c9a24989b38ec3db233e04d1@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <CA+dB4X4edhyJa+FR8phiJvQqi1wPU+eqsZ4=b4WHL7mFj-Dkgw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <6c57d13d-7f48-67b5-fdad-4f230f46553f@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 21:19:11 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CA+dB4X4edhyJa+FR8phiJvQqi1wPU+eqsZ4=b4WHL7mFj-Dkgw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/dSPNPtJc1E6e3pmo5hB686WGYF0>
Cc: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
Subject: [dhcwg] WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security-01 - respond by Nov 9
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 19:19:30 -0000

Hi,
Authors believe this draft to be ready for working group last call.
Please send your substantial comments to the mailing list and express
your opinion whether this draft is ready for publication. Feel free to
send nitpicks and minor corrections to the authors directly.

This draft has been adopted relatively recently. It's a very short draft
(a bit over 3 pages of the actual text) that explains how communication
between relays and servers could be secured using IPSec.
The issue it tries to address was raised during IESG discussions couple
months ago when processing one of the earlier DHC drafts.

Please post your comments by Nov. 9th. Since Bernie is a co-author, I
will determine the consensus.

Title: Security of Messages Exchanged Between Servers and Relay Agents
Authors: Bernie Volz, Yogendra Pal
Filename: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security-01
Pages: 8
Date: 2016-10-17

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security-01

Thanks,
Tomek

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email