[dhcwg] Results for WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-topo-conf-03.txt - Respond by Oct 13, 2014
"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Wed, 15 October 2014 13:07 UTC
Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B410A1A1ABE for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 06:07:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FvlKxi0KZ7SY for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 06:07:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 553F01A1B16 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 06:06:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=10118; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1413378418; x=1414588018; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=LRaCeIyk3w+yBUOz2OhXx5ajBGDN2zhzt6xQTWR3bjg=; b=MuC4Kn11Adv3pk0l+Pmu7WlVSnNSH7/Ui+TiqSQsvj9wen2bKDZdF486 CYL8gHUYltNKE9U1jtyrnGtBe5qduQjc+qm8/U9gaUW4BgkZs5vdT1poR Y+O7+S8SnudVBs/3uW2Hkdock5vXP8VJvI/63kMK4NR0CbmJHEKXKMp14 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnUGAAVxPlStJV2d/2dsb2JhbABbgkhGU1gEyhGBbodNAoESFgFyC4QCAQEBBC1eARkEAQELHTkUCQkBBBMIiDYNo0ekagEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEZjQyDETcHgyeBHgWRf4REiEE8gwqHZYIngxqDfoN3bIFIgQIBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,724,1406592000"; d="scan'208,217";a="360353505"
Received: from rcdn-core-6.cisco.com ([173.37.93.157]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 15 Oct 2014 13:06:57 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x07.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x07.cisco.com [173.36.12.81]) by rcdn-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9FD6vl2013221 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 13:06:57 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.78]) by xhc-aln-x07.cisco.com ([173.36.12.81]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 08:06:57 -0500
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Results for WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-topo-conf-03.txt - Respond by Oct 13, 2014
Thread-Index: Ac/od9zGHrs2omZ3RB2GQXvwNWs42w==
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 13:06:56 +0000
Message-ID: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1B6CEA07@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.86.253.176]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1B6CEA07xmbrcdx04ciscoc_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/nAaV8zmAqSOvgHwM5Lzt3n3ANSE
Subject: [dhcwg] Results for WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-topo-conf-03.txt - Respond by Oct 13, 2014
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 13:07:08 -0000
Hi: We (mostly I as Tomek is a co-author of the document, but he agreed) have determined that this document did NOT pass WGLC. Thanks to those that reviewed it, but we feel that the level of responses was a bit too low to find for "rough consensus". There were also some good issues raised. Therefore, Tomek will update the document and we will try for another WGLC sometime in the near future. We really would like to see more responses from the WG to last calls. - Bernie From: dhcwg [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bernie Volz (volz) Sent: Monday, September 29, 2014 10:36 AM To: dhcwg@ietf.org Subject: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-topo-conf-03.txt - Respond by Oct 13, 2014 Hi all, This message starts the DHC working group last call to advance "Customizing DHCP Configuration on the Basis of Network Topology", draft-ietf-dhc-topo-conf-03, document as an Informational RFC. The authors believe that this version is ready. The draft is available here: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-topo-conf-03 Please send your comments by October 13th, 2014. If you do not feel this document should advance, please state your reasons why. There are no IPR claims reported at this time. Bernie Volz is the assigned shepherd for this document. - Tomek & Bernie
- [dhcwg] Results for WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-topo-… Bernie Volz (volz)