Re: [dhcwg] Call for Adoption - draft-bvtm-dhc-mac-assign - Respond by April 16, 2019

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Wed, 27 March 2019 18:09 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE5991203E9 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 11:09:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rkl5jUA66YSD for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 11:09:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F34D12039D for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 11:09:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27182300ADE for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 13:51:12 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id x_ekXz5c0sSo for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 13:51:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from dhcp-8a9b.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-8a9b.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.138.155]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 617BD300177; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 13:51:08 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <C704CC7D-2EBB-4A01-8388-AA8DBB93C696@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3830E0D7-DFDC-4ED1-BF0A-F7AF3700D75E"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 14:09:24 -0400
In-Reply-To: <8E936B87-EA8F-4A2C-AEBC-74231D93E175@jisc.ac.uk>
Cc: Bernie Volz <volz@cisco.com>, "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, "draft-bvtm-dhc-mac-assign@ietf.org" <draft-bvtm-dhc-mac-assign@ietf.org>
To: Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>
References: <DM6PR11MB361126AF4FD6E9443B76C4C7CF580@DM6PR11MB3611.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <8E936B87-EA8F-4A2C-AEBC-74231D93E175@jisc.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/nmHhONwuQgGtYBc317bAqsQ_UBU>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Call for Adoption - draft-bvtm-dhc-mac-assign - Respond by April 16, 2019
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 18:09:33 -0000

I understand that the IEEE 802 might work on a protocol to dynamically assign a MAC address, but I think it is important to get both an IP address and a MAC address in one round trip.  That needs to be done in the IETF.

I support adoption.

Russ


> On Mar 27, 2019, at 10:13 AM, Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I support adoption. I understand the IEEE is supportive, and that there is no other alternative being proposed in that community.
> 
> I agree we should keep the "quadrant" draft separate.
> 
> Tim 
> 
> 
> 
>> On 27 Mar 2019, at 13:56, Bernie Volz (volz) <volz@cisco.com <mailto:volz@cisco.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi:
>>  
>> As discussed at the DHC WG session at IETF-104, we are trying another call … this starts the WG Call for Adoption for the draft-bvtm-dhc-mac-assign-02 document. Please respond by end of day April 16, 2019 whether you support adoption of this work or not.
>>  
>> This was presented at IETF-104 (see https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/104/materials/slides-104-dhc-link-layer-addresses-assignment-mechanism-for-dhcpv6-refresher-01 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/104/materials/slides-104-dhc-link-layer-addresses-assignment-mechanism-for-dhcpv6-refresher-01>) and also IETF-101 (seehttps://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/101/materials/slides-101-dhc-mac-addresses-assignment-for-dhcpv6-01 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/101/materials/slides-101-dhc-mac-addresses-assignment-for-dhcpv6-01>) and discussed with our Area Director (Suresh) as acceptable work for the DHC WG to adopt. This work was also presented by Tomek and Bernie to the IEEE P802.1CQ discussions at the OmniRAN meeting in May 2018 – slides available at https://github.com/dhcwg/dhcp-mac/blob/master/ietf-dhc-mac-assign.pdf <https://github.com/dhcwg/dhcp-mac/blob/master/ietf-dhc-mac-assign.pdf>, as the IEEE is exploring allocation protocols.
>>  
>> If you are silent, it is not possible for us to know your support or lack therefore; so please do respond if you feel this work is something the DHC WG should (or should not) work on.
>>  
>> Thanks much!
>>  
>> Tomek & Bernie
>>  
>> PS: We will also start a call on the extension work draft-bernardos-dhc-slap-quadrant <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-bernardos-dhc-slap-quadrant-01.txt> shortly.
>> _______________________________________________
>> dhcwg mailing list
>> dhcwg@ietf.org <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg