IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dime] #51: OC-Supported-Features in requests - conclusions

"DOLLY, MARTIN C" <md3135@att.com> Fri, 21 February 2014 17:33 UTC

Return-Path: <md3135@att.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65C6A1A0554 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 09:33:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.747
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.747 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yf49Aq-bgEpv for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 09:33:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com (nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com [209.65.160.92]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DF111A0553 for <dime@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 09:33:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unknown [144.160.229.24] (EHLO alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com) by nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-7.2.1-0) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id edd87035.0.5415544.00-2177.15204563.nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com (envelope-from <md3135@att.com>); Fri, 21 Feb 2014 17:33:18 +0000 (UTC)
X-MXL-Hash: 53078dde1814ad6b-f401320fd0cdda3e04c8345f62689d9b7bb5b035
Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s1LHXHh0005090; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 12:33:18 -0500
Received: from mlpi409.sfdc.sbc.com (mlpi409.sfdc.sbc.com [130.9.128.241]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s1LHX7BK004775 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 21 Feb 2014 12:33:12 -0500
Received: from MISOUT7MSGHUB9E.ITServices.sbc.com (MISOUT7MSGHUB9E.itservices.sbc.com [144.151.223.61]) by mlpi409.sfdc.sbc.com (RSA Interceptor); Fri, 21 Feb 2014 17:32:50 GMT
Received: from MISOUT7MSGUSR9I.ITServices.sbc.com ([144.151.223.56]) by MISOUT7MSGHUB9E.ITServices.sbc.com ([144.151.223.61]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 12:32:50 -0500
From: "DOLLY, MARTIN C" <md3135@att.com>
To: "lionel.morand@orange.com" <lionel.morand@orange.com>, Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>, "dime@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Dime] #51: OC-Supported-Features in requests - conclusions
Thread-Index: AQHPLxZ1hLRw+v0oi0isM3SaOUzTt5q/9wOQgAAAnYA=
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 17:32:49 +0000
Message-ID: <E42CCDDA6722744CB241677169E836560259C406@MISOUT7MSGUSR9I.ITServices.sbc.com>
References: <087A34937E64E74E848732CFF8354B9209783FFD@ESESSMB101.ericsson.se> <5BCBA1FC2B7F0B4C9D935572D9000668151B4120@DEMUMBX014.nsn-intra.net> <087A34937E64E74E848732CFF8354B920978409B@ESESSMB101.ericsson.se> <53076B57.90607@usdonovans.com> <16056_1393003827_53078D33_16056_14282_1_6B7134B31289DC4FAF731D844122B36E4B6282@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
In-Reply-To: <16056_1393003827_53078D33_16056_14282_1_6B7134B31289DC4FAF731D844122B36E4B6282@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.175.80.145]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_E42CCDDA6722744CB241677169E836560259C406MISOUT7MSGUSR9I_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-AnalysisOut: [v=2.0 cv=StMnHoy0 c=1 sm=1 a=dhB6nF3YHL5t/Ixux6cINA==:17 a]
X-AnalysisOut: [=rfGoQfdUtSUA:10 a=ofMgfj31e3cA:10 a=674JCT6vZqcA:10 a=BLc]
X-AnalysisOut: [eEmwcHowA:10 a=zQP7CpKOAAAA:8 a=XIqpo32RAAAA:8 a=lARpexBee]
X-AnalysisOut: [C0A:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=z9tbli-vAAAA:8 a=02K0Y2VpAAAA:8 ]
X-AnalysisOut: [a=YrZSAqJbcsq49oSL0I0A:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=lZB815dzVvQA:]
X-AnalysisOut: [10 a=oAXR_kdF8uMA:10 a=zwC7bnKO5xoA:10 a=i3UpFkP1DebNM5VB:]
X-AnalysisOut: [21 a=T0OeDJk0nKZKFJSe:21 a=yMhMjlubAAAA:8 a=SSmOFEACAAAA:8]
X-AnalysisOut: [ a=cw8pqW1q8k_GDMI4vV8A:9 a=gKO2Hq4RSVkA:10 a=UiCQ7L4-1S4A]
X-AnalysisOut: [:10 a=hTZeC7Yk6K0A:10 a=frz4AuCg-hUA:10 a=Eg51EOiEwA6I40cC]
X-AnalysisOut: [:21 a=R-Woa8sNJoIHZLB5:21]
X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2010122901)]
X-MAIL-FROM: <md3135@att.com>
X-SOURCE-IP: [144.160.229.24]
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/6GVIqc91gkUVQm_UXQm6cNHGCNE
Subject: Re: [Dime] #51: OC-Supported-Features in requests - conclusions
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 17:33:26 -0000

My understanding as well

From: DiME [mailto:dime-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of lionel.morand@orange.com
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 12:30 PM
To: Steve Donovan; dime@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Dime] #51: OC-Supported-Features in requests - conclusions

+1

De : DiME [mailto:dime-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Steve Donovan
Envoyé : vendredi 21 février 2014 16:06
À : dime@ietf.org<mailto:dime@ietf.org>
Objet : Re: [Dime] #51: OC-Supported-Features in requests - conclusions

+1
On 2/21/14 3:23 AM, Maria Cruz Bartolome wrote:

Yes, sorry about this, this was my understanding as well but I provided a wrong rephrasing.

My understanding is the following conclusions is reached:



#51: OC-Supported-Features in requests



 Now:

 The OC-Supported-Features AVP SHOULD be included into every Diameter  message a DOIC  supporting node sends (and intends to use for DOIC purposes).



Proposal:

The OC-Supported-Features AVP MUST be included into every Diameter request message a DOIC supporting node sends.





-----Original Message-----

From: Wiehe, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich) [mailto:ulrich.wiehe@nsn.com]

Sent: viernes, 21 de febrero de 2014 10:19

To: Maria Cruz Bartolome; dime@ietf.org<mailto:dime@ietf.org>

Subject: RE: [Dime] #51: OC-Supported-Features in requests - conclusions



I do not agree

I think the conclusion was to say:

The OC-Supported-Features AVP MUST be included into every Diameter request message a DOIC supporting node sends.



For OC-Supported-Features AVP in answer messages refer to issue #30.



Ulrich



-----Original Message-----

From: DiME [mailto:dime-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of ext Maria Cruz Bartolome

Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 9:35 AM

To: dime@ietf.org<mailto:dime@ietf.org>

Subject: [Dime] #51: OC-Supported-Features in requests - conclusions



#51: OC-Supported-Features in requests



My understanding is the following conclusions is reached:



 Now:

 The OC-Supported-Features AVP SHOULD be included into every Diameter  message a DOIC  supporting node sends (and intends to use for DOIC purposes).



Proposal:

replace SHOULD by MUST



_______________________________________________

DiME mailing list

DiME@ietf.org<mailto:DiME@ietf.org>

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime



_______________________________________________

DiME mailing list

DiME@ietf.org<mailto:DiME@ietf.org>

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime




_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________



Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc

pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler

a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,

Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.



This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;

they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.

If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.

As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.

Thank you.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email