IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dime] #51: OC-Supported-Features in requests - conclusions

Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com> Fri, 21 February 2014 15:06 UTC

Return-Path: <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ACF81A0185 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 07:06:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.12
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.12 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qa8n1u4zzKJg for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 07:06:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from biz131.inmotionhosting.com (biz131.inmotionhosting.com [173.247.247.114]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E5501A0172 for <dime@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 07:06:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cpe-76-187-100-94.tx.res.rr.com ([76.187.100.94]:54617 helo=SDmac.local) by biz131.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>) id 1WGrfr-0002xu-UR for dime@ietf.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 07:06:01 -0800
Message-ID: <53076B57.90607@usdonovans.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 09:05:59 -0600
From: Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dime@ietf.org
References: <087A34937E64E74E848732CFF8354B9209783FFD@ESESSMB101.ericsson.se> <5BCBA1FC2B7F0B4C9D935572D9000668151B4120@DEMUMBX014.nsn-intra.net> <087A34937E64E74E848732CFF8354B920978409B@ESESSMB101.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <087A34937E64E74E848732CFF8354B920978409B@ESESSMB101.ericsson.se>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020602050901090308000000"
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - biz131.inmotionhosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - usdonovans.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: biz131.inmotionhosting.com: authenticated_id: srdonovan@usdonovans.com
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/JuPNsA1Yi5FkrqGCA4wju5v4yt8
Subject: Re: [Dime] #51: OC-Supported-Features in requests - conclusions
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:06:06 -0000

+1
On 2/21/14 3:23 AM, Maria Cruz Bartolome wrote:
> Yes, sorry about this, this was my understanding as well but I provided a wrong rephrasing.
> My understanding is the following conclusions is reached:
>
> #51: OC-Supported-Features in requests
>
>  Now:
>  The OC-Supported-Features AVP SHOULD be included into every Diameter  message a DOIC  supporting node sends (and intends to use for DOIC purposes).
>  
> Proposal:
> The OC-Supported-Features AVP MUST be included into every Diameter request message a DOIC supporting node sends.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wiehe, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich) [mailto:ulrich.wiehe@nsn.com] 
> Sent: viernes, 21 de febrero de 2014 10:19
> To: Maria Cruz Bartolome; dime@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [Dime] #51: OC-Supported-Features in requests - conclusions
>
> I do not agree
> I think the conclusion was to say:
> The OC-Supported-Features AVP MUST be included into every Diameter request message a DOIC supporting node sends.
>
> For OC-Supported-Features AVP in answer messages refer to issue #30.
>
> Ulrich  
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: DiME [mailto:dime-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of ext Maria Cruz Bartolome
> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 9:35 AM
> To: dime@ietf.org
> Subject: [Dime] #51: OC-Supported-Features in requests - conclusions
>
> #51: OC-Supported-Features in requests
>  
> My understanding is the following conclusions is reached:
>
>  Now:
>  The OC-Supported-Features AVP SHOULD be included into every Diameter  message a DOIC  supporting node sends (and intends to use for DOIC purposes).
>  
> Proposal:
> replace SHOULD by MUST
>
> _______________________________________________
> DiME mailing list
> DiME@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
>
> _______________________________________________
> DiME mailing list
> DiME@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email