Re: [Dime] Issue#29 proposed conclusion
Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Mon, 24 February 2014 23:02 UTC
Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CD6E1A0320 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 15:02:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.447
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.447 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 58d6amCmAFeM for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 15:02:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 381321A030A for <dime@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 15:02:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.1.29] (cpe-173-172-146-58.tx.res.rr.com [173.172.146.58]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.8/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s1ON1dKn088885 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 24 Feb 2014 17:02:32 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-173-172-146-58.tx.res.rr.com [173.172.146.58] claimed to be [10.0.1.29]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\))
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <530BA310.4090100@usdonovans.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 17:02:31 -0600
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8BE5229D-E276-4084-B6EB-DBF89817E02F@nostrum.com>
References: <5BCBA1FC2B7F0B4C9D935572D9000668151B3B73@DEMUMBX014.nsn-intra.net> <32C8E469-48AE-4336-AF92-F6EB2B12EDA4@nostrum.com> <530BA310.4090100@usdonovans.com>
To: Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/K5yVVqiAF89f-CvYQs6FqmRuyzM
Cc: "dime@ietf.org list" <dime@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Dime] Issue#29 proposed conclusion
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 23:02:37 -0000
On Feb 24, 2014, at 1:52 PM, Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com> wrote: > I agree. > > I also think that we agreed that the lifetime of the OC-Supported-Features AVP is a single transaction and that the OC-Supported-Features AVP must be included in all requests originated by a Diameter node supporting DOIC. +1, and my previous agreement was based on that assumption. > > Steve > > On 2/20/14 4:31 PM, Ben Campbell wrote: >> I concur with removing the sequence number from OC-Supported-Features. >> >> >
- [Dime] Issue#29 proposed conclusion Wiehe, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [Dime] Issue#29 proposed conclusion Ben Campbell
- Re: [Dime] Issue#29 proposed conclusion Steve Donovan
- Re: [Dime] Issue#29 proposed conclusion Ben Campbell
- Re: [Dime] Issue#29 proposed conclusion Steve Donovan
- Re: [Dime] Issue#29 proposed conclusion Steve Donovan
- Re: [Dime] Issue#29 proposed conclusion TROTTIN, JEAN-JACQUES (JEAN-JACQUES)