[Dime] DOIC document size and placeholders
Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Thu, 28 November 2013 09:34 UTC
Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B140B1ADBD2 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 01:34:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s6q0muJ4sBME for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 01:34:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lb0-x231.google.com (mail-lb0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::231]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37E6D1ADEDC for <dime@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 01:34:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lb0-f177.google.com with SMTP id w7so5970253lbi.36 for <dime@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 01:34:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:message-id:date :to:mime-version; bh=KcwVUdxniSIHM8cAixBQU7ipJ5Xgt31pYp7TOtc1+DA=; b=KbtRY/ZoL6GK8bJb4XQAFFpyOsEGDjsUXhls8UfRywNaNcC9AKNV9TLICCnZ/tecpf fr714G9BxDz5mZHUdIvc1it0W9DxPNntWrtiqhRi9/H4t0H182dC3jCS7E8yA4hRrHnv kTpYyxom9P8UCtNGSQwnNvyZY2tG1W9OxSbhuUWHqWgn4W+HxMmXKJac42RS1hcnlCAb /JgV1hfJJ83y0/Cj+0NrYWMa4ilNCPyxsRD343/6U2PcXq3l8t/GuKuCGKvvncRd2TMo nOuZJepnUwROQJUc0xVyHdPW0C25s/monIWLB+MQHWzWQdCt8hfY2HInBTOP22qBAZS0 wJ3A==
X-Received: by 10.152.140.193 with SMTP id ri1mr32626857lab.18.1385631247769; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 01:34:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.250.143] ([194.100.71.98]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id qj3sm48892642lbb.1.2013.11.28.01.34.06 for <dime@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 28 Nov 2013 01:34:06 -0800 (PST)
From: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <50C72080-905C-4B1D-BAD8-C0026791BA6E@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 11:34:06 +0200
To: "dime@ietf.org list" <dime@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Subject: [Dime] DOIC document size and placeholders
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 09:34:10 -0000
Folks, We have some hefty sized appendices and some of the placeholders include no text. I was thinking whether we could just drop appendices on: o Conformance to Requirements o 3GPP S6a interface overload indication - example o 3GPP PCC interfaces overload indication - example They would be very informational nature anyway in a standards track document.. Opinions? - Jouni
- [Dime] DOIC document size and placeholders Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [Dime] DOIC document size and placeholders lionel.morand
- Re: [Dime] DOIC document size and placeholders Steve Donovan
- Re: [Dime] DOIC document size and placeholders Maria Cruz Bartolome
- Re: [Dime] DOIC document size and placeholders lionel.morand
- Re: [Dime] DOIC document size and placeholders Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [Dime] DOIC document size and placeholders Ben Campbell