Re: [Dime] [dime] #23: DOIC behavior for realm overload

[Steve Donovan <[e-mail]>]

We've had a lot of discussion of this topic.

I believe that we reached agreement that we currently have two types of
reports:

- Host report that applies to requests sent to a destination-host
- Realm report that applies requests routed to a realm that do not have
a specified destination-host (realm-routed requests)

We also have proposed wording on the interaction between these report
types. 

I propose that the second be renamed to realm-routed reports.

A separate ticket has been opened on the need for a third report type
that would apply to all request routed to a realm, independent of
whether a request contains a destination-host AVP.

Steve

On 1/21/14 9:24 AM, dime issue tracker wrote:
> #23: DOIC behavior for realm overload
>
>  This applies to draft-ietf-dime-ovli-01, which does not show up in the
>  Component drop down menu.
>
>  The current assumption in the -01 draft is inconsistent in the definition
>  of behavior of behavior by a reacting node when it receives a realm
>  overload report.
>
>  Section 4.6 says overload treatment should apply to all request bound for
>  the overloaded realm.
>
>  Section 5.5.2 is not clear and there have been interpretations that a
>  realm overload report only applies to requests that contain the realm and
>  do not contain a destination-host AVP.
>
>  Section 5.5.2 should be updated to be consistent with section 4.6.
>