Re: [Dime] OLR applicable for any/all applications

Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Tue, 03 December 2013 09:26 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7190C1AE0E2 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 01:26:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pJkFTb1UMtjE for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 01:26:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-bk0-x234.google.com (mail-bk0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4008:c01::234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09FEA1AE0EE for <dime@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 01:26:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-bk0-f52.google.com with SMTP id u14so5844721bkz.39 for <dime@ietf.org>; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 01:26:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=BjlgZIrYbwTJ07Tgv/qAsFO8OcF4sSeYPb8ESlzI5Ok=; b=JwrlJpRp4pcrDgDYc/H1CuiHKhzVSEQJ4A1fLkYeGhVuAoQiEgzf+qlwJ25cqZ4BSB aNxQtvtkZbviLygaYmR5dzl29Mn1SpuMvSBhMzfEELTVS8pwIdsb1V533zgGg+eyEJHV lMGrd46ZilU6H1Tl3H+7/XulOcnCmI/yjqXFhS14B5sMsGv1DkohVnww10Ed3zeww7lu pva1F4cpTBV9aNPFfRMMnuA93mZVaWV7XW2U+XT/dS9lH7Cra2eX5Lg8GUnZpxoFCfm8 oZA9jfOnAyuvWj1Vq3vSi1dpebopAfmCln5DNPoFAcrcaEx9y0l3iqNKZ0d8oPhpbZQ4 zuSQ==
X-Received: by 10.205.68.69 with SMTP id xx5mr429283bkb.143.1386062767941; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 01:26:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:6e8:480:60:8140:b30:4238:2452? ([2001:6e8:480:60:8140:b30:4238:2452]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id t2sm77734181bkh.3.2013.12.03.01.26.07 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 03 Dec 2013 01:26:07 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <087A34937E64E74E848732CFF8354B920972BE0C@ESESSMB101.ericsson.se>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 11:26:06 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <14D4A644-96B1-4B0F-892E-B969922C94D3@gmail.com>
References: <087A34937E64E74E848732CFF8354B920972BE0C@ESESSMB101.ericsson.se>
To: Maria Cruz Bartolome <maria.cruz.bartolome@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Cc: "dime@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Dime] OLR applicable for any/all applications
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 09:26:13 -0000

Hmm.. wasn't there just recently rather strong opposition 
to include anything beyond "implicit" information into the
OLR?

- Jouni


On Dec 3, 2013, at 10:42 AM, Maria Cruz Bartolome <maria.cruz.bartolome@ericsson.com> wrote:

>  
> Dear all,
>  
> There may be a need by a reporting node to request traffic reduction for all traffic, application independent, e.g. if an operator’s network becomes severely overloaded, it may be of interest to signal directly general overload to the client.  
> 
> In this case, since reacting node obtains affected application from the application message, we may need to extend OLR.
>  
> At least we got following options:
>  
>  
> A)     Define a new optional AVP that could be included into OLR, like e.g.:
>    OC-OLR ::= < AVP Header: TBD2 >
>               < TimeStamp >
>               [ Reduction-Percentage ]
>               [ ValidityDuration ]
>               [ ReportType ]
>               [All applications]
>             * [ AVP ]
>  
>  
> B)      Extend  ReportTypes like e.g.:
>  
>    3  Destination-Host All Applications report.  Similar to Destination-Host report but it would apply to any application regardless the application message this report is received within.
>  
>    4  Realm (aggregated) All Applications report.  Similar to Realm report but it would apply to any application regardless the application message this report is received within.
>  
>  
>  
> I tend to prefer option A, but let me know your opinions and preferences.
> Best regards
> /MCruz
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> DiME mailing list
> DiME@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime