Re: Request for X.500 advanced usages

Sylvain Langlois <Sylvain.Langlois@der.edf.fr> Tue, 30 June 1992 08:32 UTC

Received: by merit.edu (5.65/1123-1.0) id AA27806; Tue, 30 Jun 92 04:32:57 -0400
Received: from chenas.inria.fr by merit.edu (5.65/1123-1.0) id AA27802; Tue, 30 Jun 92 04:32:50 -0400
Received: from edf.edf.fr by chenas.inria.fr (5.65c8d/92.02.29) via Fnet-EUnet id AA21973; Tue, 30 Jun 1992 10:30:17 +0200 (MET)
Received: from cli53an.der.edf.fr by edf.edf.fr with SMTP id AA02840 (5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4); Tue, 30 Jun 1992 10:31:31 +0200
Received: from loghost by cli53an.der.edf.fr (4.1/SMI-4.0) id AA00887; Tue, 30 Jun 92 10:31:06 +0100
To: osi-ds@cicb.fr
Cc: disi, osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Subject: Re: Request for X.500 advanced usages
In-Reply-To: clw@merit.edu's message of 29 Jun 92 12:12:41 -0400. <9206291612.AA17174@home.merit.edu>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 92 10:31:05 +0100
Message-Id: <886.709896665@cli53an>
From: Sylvain Langlois <Sylvain.Langlois@der.edf.fr>

> X.500 Advanced Usages Query
Chris et al.
Thoughts we had in San Diego about  network infrastructure description
clearly belongs to this track. As I said in a previous mail, some work
about policy routing support needs  to be discussed  to. I guess there
will  be a lot of  interest from regional networks  in this topic too.
I'll try  to formalize a  bit. We  should  discuss  it off line before
injecting anything in the mailing lists. What do you think ?

Sylvain

----------------
Sylvain Langlois		  "Dogmatic attachement to the supposed merits
(Sylvain.Langlois@der.edf.fr)	   of a particular structure hinders the search
				   of an appropriate structure" (Robert Fripp)