Re: [dispatch] draft-jesske-dispatch-forking-answer-correlation-01: comments
Sergio Ibanez candela <sergio.ibanez.candela@oracle.com> Wed, 01 October 2014 10:40 UTC
Return-Path: <sergio.ibanez.candela@oracle.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 796F51ACD99 for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 03:40:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.987
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.987 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Oz-9Q6EKkz63 for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 03:40:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from userp1040.oracle.com (userp1040.oracle.com [156.151.31.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEE2D1ACD0B for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 03:40:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ucsinet21.oracle.com (ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id s91AeZwG004514 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 1 Oct 2014 10:40:36 GMT
Received: from userz7022.oracle.com (userz7022.oracle.com [156.151.31.86]) by ucsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s91AeZK7022199 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 1 Oct 2014 10:40:35 GMT
Received: from abhmp0002.oracle.com (abhmp0002.oracle.com [141.146.116.8]) by userz7022.oracle.com (8.14.5+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s91AeX0j027033; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 10:40:33 GMT
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <84094e87-9997-4444-bb09-7a6989a75c1b@default>
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 03:40:35 -0700
From: Sergio Ibanez candela <sergio.ibanez.candela@oracle.com>
Sender: Sergio Ibanez candela <sergio.ibanez.candela@oracle.com>
To: dispatch@ietf.org, R.Jesske@telekom.de
References: <82a8083a078209c80187a46304ff5532@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <82a8083a078209c80187a46304ff5532@mail.gmail.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.8.2 (807160) [OL 14.0.7113.0 (x86)]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Source-IP: ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93]
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/egaOBotNw_8iyRpmJWLXm28hKVM
Subject: Re: [dispatch] draft-jesske-dispatch-forking-answer-correlation-01: comments
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 10:40:38 -0000
Hi, Some comments regarding draft-jesske-dispatch-forking-answer-correlation-01. 1) It has already been mentioned, but the UAC don't have to send a CANCEL for the non-confirmed early dialogs after the 200OK. This is incorrect. The forking proxy should cancel all the legs that have not been confirmed. The UAC will just consider them as terminated after 64*T1 after the first 200OK. 2) Do you have any specific logic to identify which 18x responses are going to be forwarded back to the UAC and which won't? In your examples I see that, in the case of reliable responses, each provisional response will update the dialog towards the UAC, and therefore always taking the latest one. Is this just an example?, do you have any logic in mind to channel this updates? 3) What happens if the UAC does not support reliable responses? 4) The early media scenario has not been covered, but I guess it'll be related to 4.3 and 4.4, and in this cases the dialog towards the UAC is always updated with the newest SDP. Will this mean that the audio will be also updated to the latest one? Thanks, Sergio
- [dispatch] draft-jesske-dispatch-forking-answer-c… Brett Tate
- Re: [dispatch] draft-jesske-dispatch-forking-answ… Sergio Ibanez candela
- Re: [dispatch] draft-jesske-dispatch-forking-answ… R.Jesske
- Re: [dispatch] draft-jesske-dispatch-forking-answ… R.Jesske
- Re: [dispatch] draft-jesske-dispatch-forking-answ… Brett Tate
- Re: [dispatch] draft-jesske-dispatch-forking-answ… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [dispatch] draft-jesske-dispatch-forking-answ… R.Jesske
- Re: [dispatch] draft-jesske-dispatch-forking-answ… R.Jesske
- Re: [dispatch] draft-jesske-dispatch-forking-answ… Dale R. Worley