IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dispatch] Fwd: WGLC: draft-ietf-dispatch-javascript-mjs-02.txt

Bradley Meck <bradley.meck@gmail.com> Tue, 17 July 2018 14:25 UTC

Return-Path: <bradley.meck@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BBDD129385; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 07:25:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 734K2JUXl5zz; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 07:25:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x234.google.com (mail-it0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69E1E130FCD; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 07:25:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x234.google.com with SMTP id v71-v6so2132516itb.3; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 07:25:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=7qbcFyH/2xDj4GWmku5qe1pLGvrnHQqYqqchu4YInxs=; b=poq3HswxKQT23yrvQOT8YEEToBz6TNZoNoz8XhuxoLsNFYriQsaMc1r8w0gSlQ+5Um YA9GycxmjRuv1lQhjsKuZ0fYQWgS3Rp6xzduSpOA/tOP5VmmxORhWg4wRcgpF3xJfptE wf0HoYqaj7Cl2RjD2n3i8tJYfeKiA02E0UMYLt9CnYWkUl3JQtAmWdFHoo03KAv5oa9a uA1c/kitxyDDEET9Ju4qpwFtEmToz3KAJOu1dDmiJH6PR54jt6Da/9xWPo+fJ0CsabZ5 flWfYhXPp4xP+do5UgSLvZy5NopO/U8jw+VBg1L+HGnwf0lQjL8Qs+W3hZBdJz25Is7z 64vw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7qbcFyH/2xDj4GWmku5qe1pLGvrnHQqYqqchu4YInxs=; b=rC6xc0pO0ZiKclgPV9WxDW+7O1RQBvmdcTuAY65HbOX+YoaW17tROfoQ5JRz1aiegw 5clTSBByt40CVAPO4FmT7FlRc6Lo5N6L6IkpBJHTeoNVack6C+TY9ACStFTIP9eNrrmj cC0oeYQzP1M7Vm93Abclm2NYuunCQeSWWYQbWRj5CfU4yz77AhnZXLydOWhHRuO7vOmY 2fKopJiXvq7afBIWwxX0bFDcFoITFCrgbuKXQjX4m0uD1c5MHG8/LXW4TTMPBtv7VVo2 l4jx9asmPcP+yYPhitCT13t/UOicaYyZI0qP9QB7k6PuVfyP44EQjCgiiOpnae1VOIWp E9zQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlGOXtGgVdrt8FafOGZEAcyXcb7+CmjtYziqeAHTAGT8FmATXvPQ +CZXTRrp9XWeRPgPy1ef+IRTpmfsHGzMy+WVAD0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpfZIQhvfQINbiZyrmwSqwhqbJfxdoX4kNZgqmZev2h/ARr+mXV5tVFa9LROGTRHT+i/Hm32vkGVQIA8YkYEUvs=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:9833:: with SMTP id t48-v6mr1681732jaj.111.1531837522684; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 07:25:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAHBDyN5kB=yi_eFty2hRO4LpadKrSSY0KY-BAS2447Y84pPoWg@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnXEbYtc7VKisvyTEAiTbteQPT=gXF9HY=VgeSrSCo7FCg@mail.gmail.com> <CANnEKUaUuRQ5NrLafcg_BtVKTdf+NNgDUEfn0h2oWh4R1F6+xw@mail.gmail.com> <CANnEKUbBY4XsFsR_-zP1v_PJnav6mhtFUBC5YOGt1OrzNNSzew@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnWnhoW8Om9DKgiTXMcC466d9y_4zDy0newrb5LFWqO47Q@mail.gmail.com> <000001d41dd8$a2ad12e0$e80738a0$@acm.org>
In-Reply-To: <000001d41dd8$a2ad12e0$e80738a0$@acm.org>
From: Bradley Meck <bradley.meck@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 09:25:18 -0500
Message-ID: <CANnEKUZCyb29-_e-6FKrqM0vbJyiZkOSuFj_0GZAq5ve4H=wFg@mail.gmail.com>
To: LMM@acm.org
Cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, DISPATCH <dispatch@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-dispatch-javascript-mjs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000064ae82057132b706"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/sshlBJ_7V57MPuAWtIGSXKUwGJA>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] Fwd: WGLC: draft-ietf-dispatch-javascript-mjs-02.txt
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 14:25:27 -0000

Per https://github.com/bmeck/I-D/issues/2

The extra registrations are to match up with the Web specification on
accepted MIME types for historical reasons
https://mimesniff.spec.whatwg.org/#javascript-mime-type

On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 9:15 AM Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org> wrote:

> ➢ Only `text/javascript` is not obsolete per
> https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/scripting.html#scriptingLanguages
>
> I wonder about the utility of newly registering (or updating the
> registration) of types that are obsolete.
> If there’s significant deployment of names that new implementations need
> to be aware of, then ‘obsolete’ isn’t the right status; if not, then who
> would use the new, but obsolete, definition?
>
> Larry
> http://LarryMasinter.net
>
>
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email