IETF Logo Mail Archive

[dmarc-ietf] Meeting in Prague (IETF 99)

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Mon, 29 May 2017 16:49 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 674F3127333 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 May 2017 09:49:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jiQASOVgVjPE for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 May 2017 09:49:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22e.google.com (mail-qk0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D3F61200C5 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 May 2017 09:49:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id d14so11593165qkb.1 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 May 2017 09:49:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Pw4Eijt6MABrSeeZF0UkA8LHqDES+ZofU7sl28iu7ec=; b=hlzpbYOYwlmUqruJTzhtmLHgkE+rnyFnDxHgepUH3eOoaLw8fLqzfULe5E8iC/QnfA /wt847LcVFJ4zorxpmT95ehoA5QTDASmxWfbePV9tEy8GVROavWFmaGpRHQKPdmlEEnu 2D/RK+IhjaH//beIZzo7qynRk5n1K7pKERnDuUvqi9fDCREg33aZ08bODXdBJLK/5NKA YktdWT58OP+5godCjewuU2aClZg3v2pOWAC7lCnAz8OVZvL5ThPpls8nggFhbZLetvX5 TQBfVQGPGpDc5Higw59Q/QMDLTkwwE85/cBqSt7l78r+bq577OSQNNtYmtdpJPjLOidR dJsA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject :to; bh=Pw4Eijt6MABrSeeZF0UkA8LHqDES+ZofU7sl28iu7ec=; b=UJ3mwbzCEgn8TIXLxy7KPJWeeOSePv7SORiTv3LIa0tB80IbaaFF0uBT1EWOW9XkfF EcRpWiN90sT97OGhsJiDgVmwoL5sSsUHW/KHhppue7LoGGJ5G+OndyOdPpfhcTuO62ee /9BFRbLixFQMfA/9FoKylZISrxV4foTCIgIKbYidkcDiOzQJcNzTkT1MEroEcRmam5KX s8tJMyrJdC78eT6FnUSFUqkh0BQ1u1hPjwvKsrOegzUKkIupT4yEMfmzyE+kAEsktWsU ZkRB1yP9t5UDmLPLlOVZcg+RVfj49uq7ms3cwTqOaEW4V9o4NK1bAPK+PFZMnXqK5ijy P6MQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcBUQwiVn7tGdhiV1pJZkPUA+kCQOJkUVxHf46E/9I5O84jBa3rv K5vNPgd/6uDQhPBYtUuQsdQnv4cIOg==
X-Received: by 10.55.163.88 with SMTP id m85mr17069334qke.118.1496076556117; Mon, 29 May 2017 09:49:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com
Received: by 10.200.36.20 with HTTP; Mon, 29 May 2017 09:49:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 01:49:15 +0900
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 64mHNteDGszb0FSMEl6kdWZFmP0
Message-ID: <CAC4RtVDiqdVj9W+zL+MbKeJeeQzU8n8DkTZG+5XdcCrT5otCRA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/T3MZdezEKqGHGttEAVpWSuWm55M>
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] Meeting in Prague (IETF 99)
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 16:49:18 -0000

We've had one request for a DMARC session in Prague, with no further
response from the working group.

We've had one suggestion for an interop test in Prague, with no
further response from the working group.

I would like to schedule a session -- at least a short one -- but I'm
not going to do that unless I hear from some people that (1) you'll be
there and (2) we have something useful to discuss face to face.

We have to decide by Friday (so, hey, let's say Thursday to be sure we
don't forget).

Barry, as chair

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email