Re: [dmarc-ietf] AD review of draft-ietf-dmarc-rfc7601bis-03.txt

Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Tue, 30 October 2018 17:53 UTC

Return-Path: <vesely@tana.it>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4948130D7A for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 10:53:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1152-bit key) header.d=tana.it
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CggF5TRbb2td for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 10:52:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wmail.tana.it (wmail.tana.it [62.94.243.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10949127333 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 10:52:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=gamma; t=1540921977; bh=Fy41Vj20qBa9PjKTbJg8Gz2BMP1GGgIc3rqsKOyz56g=; l=332; h=To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=BpfMOgzjA8oKCR/m336bQGFvz36cVlYsQp5zYDBgaVbJuJOUCAf6YLaB58UHUOMUN EyRpAoB6DuJGgBCmHN3CPGwhss0Yg/VjqNnZjp76QAdhNf7hwH9txLi1cahR2o8lsO u1VvWGjDYwBCWElTurb8wO98DBuuu+6P9u7wiO7cKUl0jNl+qOON+Ps2zhWAt
Authentication-Results: tana.it; auth=pass (details omitted)
Received: from [172.25.197.111] (pcale.tana [172.25.197.111]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 uXDGrn@SYT0/k) by wmail.tana.it with ESMTPA; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 18:52:57 +0100 id 00000000005DC077.000000005BD89A79.00001BF0
To: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
References: <3eea2f77-8aea-4f49-80f3-d96b639c378a@isode.com> <CABa8R6sdRzucAatJghXgQSa3Z0+RiVg=QhpPWo9pLOmxCCkX-A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Openpgp: id=0A5B4BB141A53F7F55FC8CBCB6ACF44490D17C00
Message-ID: <8ae3804d-8fc1-1670-e451-1e2a5153f790@tana.it>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 18:52:57 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CABa8R6sdRzucAatJghXgQSa3Z0+RiVg=QhpPWo9pLOmxCCkX-A@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/xDBOY1v9GbE_sXBMj3bscSzPPIM>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] AD review of draft-ietf-dmarc-rfc7601bis-03.txt
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 17:53:01 -0000

On Sat 27/Oct/2018 02:33:27 +0200 Brandon Long wrote:

> should authserv-id bet a dot-atom instead?  That seems to be the main uses I
> see, as a domain, and that would allow UTF-8.

That was also discussed at the time of rfc5451bis:
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg09122.html

Best
Ale
--