IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Meeting in Prague (IETF 99)

"Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com> Tue, 30 May 2017 01:41 UTC

Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67A87126CF6 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 May 2017 18:41:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=drkurt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YcZg1raRkAPG for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 May 2017 18:41:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x22f.google.com (mail-vk0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FB0E129B3C for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 May 2017 18:41:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id p85so38267689vkd.3 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 May 2017 18:41:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=jOB/dornDe3d7FNstbIeNNFMNGVsQTUaDVB4AfMvzCA=; b=Mt+Rlv09ok4EbQ3VdPr6ngi9S89JMV0bLRWPZOYwxAIQ2q/Q/poAZVtU1h7HWPv9Lf jGIQ5hXSVoP8z9/EV6N1loF4BylfCkOubHFK141+NgY9L1AkNpUeXZtuanMyW8etEA51 owW/IR5hEsn1Xo66+Z86nkKakZYvxb1JceH+8=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=jOB/dornDe3d7FNstbIeNNFMNGVsQTUaDVB4AfMvzCA=; b=B02tU+88+29Q1MI91xvhW9Sl/XOmUOzJHCB5cZJYl/5cUgGNX5SemzV+2SasbiVB+g Xnh6Nyuw2skZcGJvYn1xg3EHf5WCWaPhgVqQ6UCItRYkSaMOUtNhobzvp7Y3T2Y+p6tt qPWVDKXGkkf0LVBgGtm0TPsUK3Iq4n0AoYGqVAT2X0/MYPrEByXBgXmlLz0zepzL6PVG ufVevWQSSIuBXrF5UnxeIF/Th0qT4OLs+unu8qm1FnGOIcyEPDSN2/Snr4bOAaOnaLf7 sXGWGAyuKCTsQmSu1tz9WSTmOevfbeh20oeZCnlIvJUeBxnk2Q9LyNRDlxJ6TBMUy8ko nx2w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcBdawHRCQcnfpqHTnL/x0M+Qm89MF203swnqbVTZeL8a59jN3pS gnHN0Dmqz1OQcoQygeAEtlJAs/LwLGU+
X-Received: by 10.31.61.7 with SMTP id k7mr8355942vka.82.1496108496201; Mon, 29 May 2017 18:41:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: kurta@drkurt.com
Received: by 10.176.77.149 with HTTP; Mon, 29 May 2017 18:41:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVDiqdVj9W+zL+MbKeJeeQzU8n8DkTZG+5XdcCrT5otCRA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAC4RtVDiqdVj9W+zL+MbKeJeeQzU8n8DkTZG+5XdcCrT5otCRA@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 09:41:35 +0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: ZeZu9Su9qoQBg21Aw_D0R-76qto
Message-ID: <CABuGu1rUSa7HZ5tZ3hc30gK4tCt3ieBRHYxzd9LO=cmmFJa+Ow@mail.gmail.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Cc: "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114da1e27649480550b3e724"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/zxSdT4meWhTYNRDmWBSx1A3qBBQ>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Meeting in Prague (IETF 99)
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 01:41:39 -0000

On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 12:49 AM, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
wrote:

> We've had one request for a DMARC session in Prague, with no further
> response from the working group.
>
> We've had one suggestion for an interop test in Prague, with no
> further response from the working group.
>

Yes to both. AFAIK, Steve Jones has been in touch with the hackathon
organizers to have ARC added to the slate. Both Steve and I will be coming
to Prague and several others from the group are expected as well. We also
want to meet with the IETF tools folks to arrange an assisted upgrade to
the IETF listserv to enable ARC signing.

>From my POV, the ARC spec is close to "done". There are a few details that
are turning up from new sets of eyes looking at it as implementations are
built but so far, nothing substantive. I'll have new versions after my
flights at the end of the week (protocol & usage).

To me, the biggest point of discussion has to do with the hypothetical next
milestone for the group which is currently called out as "document[ing]
operational practices..." (the _Draft Guide on DMARC Usage_). While I
understand that was viewed as "something that we could do" when the group
was chartered, I doubt the need for it as an IETF document as time has
passed. I think that discussing the next steps of the group would be
apropos in a F2F meeting.

--Kurt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email