IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DMM] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-04: (with COMMENT)

"Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <sgundave@cisco.com> Wed, 17 May 2017 01:11 UTC

Return-Path: <sgundave@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5CA712ECBF; Tue, 16 May 2017 18:11:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.523
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.523 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y6Thu7QFVBw4; Tue, 16 May 2017 18:11:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE89812EACF; Tue, 16 May 2017 18:06:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1145; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1494983208; x=1496192808; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=y0w31gB1z35mTVwo9x2B8bjt7PpT++SMrjE8Vz7C1mw=; b=DGRpo3wnymj2xI+65Wdpu7HHtzL3uff2l2LH0TZFez231dlf7a9JlomN gz+XcmKbngp6U8WjPfF7RVSmtaXauVvAhFHpjQpQ+tYXQoUvzLTSq7oq4 c5RaSaZWmP57qE6N5ISqMF3t0RJU+Is0zNAfGOzkr2+Bs4RaYZaepJ+cK k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CXAADAoRtZ/5BdJa1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBg1WBbgeNfqdagg+GJAKFTz8YAQIBAQEBAQEBayiFGQZnEhACAQhGMiUCBA4FiiOvHIsIAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAR+GX4R5ilUBBJBljSUBkxqRa5RCAR84gQpwFYVygUp2hzaBDQEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.38,351,1491264000"; d="scan'208";a="235876171"
Received: from rcdn-core-8.cisco.com ([173.37.93.144]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 May 2017 01:06:47 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-019.cisco.com (xch-rcd-019.cisco.com [173.37.102.29]) by rcdn-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v4H16lFW002182 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 17 May 2017 01:06:47 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-008.cisco.com (173.36.7.18) by XCH-RCD-019.cisco.com (173.37.102.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Tue, 16 May 2017 20:06:46 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-008.cisco.com ([173.36.7.18]) by XCH-ALN-008.cisco.com ([173.36.7.18]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Tue, 16 May 2017 20:06:46 -0500
From: "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <sgundave@cisco.com>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
CC: "Dhananjay Patki (dhpatki)" <dhpatki@cisco.com>, Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>, Dapeng Liu <max.ldp@alibaba-inc.com>, "dmm-chairs@ietf.org" <dmm-chairs@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "dmm@ietf.org" <dmm@ietf.org>, Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, "draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-04: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHSzqnbvtOYC9paX0S8mvaizWhQfg==
Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 01:06:46 +0000
Message-ID: <D540EFBE.277395%sgundave@cisco.com>
References: <149199352865.15645.2318473152126054699.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <7D444A20-2C3B-46FE-BB25-79BE67018A8F@cisco.com> <646D4962-4826-450C-9F85-AFA4576C315A@nostrum.com> <D53E6302.276F94%sgundave@cisco.com> <90F78EB5-3E57-4D63-A971-CB3B5F66B128@nostrum.com> <D53FE017.2771C8%sgundave@cisco.com> <747F0C6C-33CD-47A1-AE98-8FDA3DDB60CC@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <747F0C6C-33CD-47A1-AE98-8FDA3DDB60CC@nostrum.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.7.1.161129
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.32.246.211]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <1519CCF4AEF7654E9D8C6FE526BB52B9@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/wFwu8kHs_whG1Z4wAzHVuDFWKro>
Subject: Re: [DMM] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management Working Group <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmm/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 01:11:07 -0000

Hi Ben,




On 5/16/17, 8:52 AM, "Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> wrote:

>
>> 
>> 
>> Yes, I do believe these options for indicating the
>>registration/heartbeat
>> timers do fall under the category of ³standard mobility options". Case
>>and
>> Point, RFC5847 defines an option for carrying ³RestartCounter² in a
>>MIPv6
>> signaling message, which the protocol peer stores and uses that counter.
>> In this example and as well in the current draft, the information
>>elements
>> carried in the option are in similar in nature, both are config
>>parameters
>> and these are elements that have influence on the protocol state
>>machine.
>
>Thanks, that's helpful information. I think a sentence or two to that
>effect would be useful in the draft. It probably doesn't need as much
>detail as you gave here. I envision something to the effect of "The
>options defined in this draft allow the configuration of re-registration
>and heartbeat frequencies. These security considerations in [RFC5213]
>apply."


Sure, we will add couple of sentences and resolve this. Thanks for the
review.

Regards
Sri

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email