Re: [dna] Last Call: draft-ietf-dna-simple (Simple procedures for Detecting Network Attachment in IPv6) to Proposed Standard
Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Wed, 11 August 2010 14:40 UTC
Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: dna@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dna@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82E673A6900; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 07:40:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.334
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.334 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.265, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rKtG4wAc8qgE; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 07:40:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 958A83A6919; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 07:40:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFE382CCCF; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 17:41:31 +0300 (EEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nvF3nbRkuTPT; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 17:41:31 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (unknown [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 309BE2CC62; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 17:41:29 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <4C62B698.5020805@piuha.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 17:41:28 +0300
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100411)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "t.petch" <daedulus@btconnect.com>
References: <20100810144346.1CD163A69E6@core3.amsl.com> <4C61B1BC.9000300@piuha.net> <013601cb3929$8ba3c7c0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
In-Reply-To: <013601cb3929$8ba3c7c0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: DNA <dna@eng.monash.edu.au>, "dna@ietf.org" <dna@ietf.org>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dna] Last Call: draft-ietf-dna-simple (Simple procedures for Detecting Network Attachment in IPv6) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: dna@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNA working group mailing list <dna.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dna>, <mailto:dna-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dna>
List-Post: <mailto:dna@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dna-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dna>, <mailto:dna-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 14:40:57 -0000
Tom, There is indeed some confusion, somehow at the point when we changed the list to an IETF one, not all places got updated. If the working group still existed (I closed it a while ago) I would ask this to be remedied. As it is, I decided to just e-mail both lists for the handful of e-mails that are necessary. The dna@ietf.org list is the one that everyone should be using, if they want to discuss DNA topics. Jari