IETF Logo Mail Archive

[dns-privacy] Re: Suggested RFC8310 improvements (authoritative DoTm better zone caching and lookup privacy)

"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com> Tue, 10 June 2025 18:45 UTC

Return-Path: <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2C5A334FA3D for <dns-privacy@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jun 2025 11:45:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=verisign.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ey9kHGpDzgMs for <dns-privacy@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jun 2025 11:45:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.verisign.com (mail3.verisign.com [72.13.63.32]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69402334FA37 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jun 2025 11:45:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=verisign.com; l=1032; q=dns/txt; s=VRSN; t=1749581153; h=from:to:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject; bh=E+mDudyFc8+NyA8G3wwTIsFHdxkzgtJDXkLuzfyd7y4=; b=iCQ2kwzdtewtdTu309f9Fqt4PBafAR98Hzn2Lx1P0SZRyYPSuu+7xcCs XbucAjLvbvaxqpHF8ne3yJSOQiEHk5OBbnSqgIvLvzNnU3lDgP2le4fMx KQ2emmXk4JGmx0CouxdLTiHe9MpoUQa5uaGKIYLEbYcxGa4X9iKskt6dw fPhROEvgnJP6UTsgHBMUXuXcWyTDl9YHprqlyZ6wXlh8UiS8c1HYmmZDO dqXEkMiNwFd5cy93gEy+Ob/tWH+kNTPaWXqrKddYBxXSuXyqDw7mRVXdp N/oCJnznaBUdQ4EW/N9OkXrPFhxkNm1FWg/V8QZ/tcpOi7d+HOcz0oLLn Q==;
X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Qvmz5fi4TryMvP0aFSe7Jw==
X-CSE-MsgGUID: y4UK2lCASy6UBzM9zFjsIw==
X-ThreatScanner-Verdict: Negative
IronPort-Data: A9a23:FpH1x6OHty6fdoHvrR2slsFynXyQoLVcMsEvi/4bfWQNrUp3gTIDm GoZWmmCPquJYmL3L91xadu+8kpSusPRn9M1TQZtpSBmQkwRpJueD7x1DKtS0wC6dZSfER09v 63yTvGacajYm1eF/k/F3oDJ9Cc6jefSAOOlUoYoAwgpLSd8UiAtlBl/rOAwh49skLCRDhiE0 T/Ii5S31GSNhXgtbAr414rZ8Eky5Kqr4GtC1rADTasjUGH2xiF94K03ePnZw0vQGuF8AuO8T uDf+7C1lkux1wstEN6sjoHgeUQMRLPIVSDW4paBc/H/6vTqjnVaPpcTbJLwW28O49m6t4kZJ OF2iHCFYVxB0pvkw71BDkYCQ0mSCoUdkFPPCSDXXcW7kRWaIyO0qxlkJBle0YYwoo6bDYzSn BCxxf9kgh2r3oqLLLyHpuZEv9omPpTlPd8joGBF0wmBBNgdTM/hXPCfjTNY9G9YasFmONf6S JMmTxdfNE2GfRZIIE9RAZ54gv2zgD/0dDgwRFC9/PJxuTSNilUsiv63abI5efTTLSlRtl2Yo WbC8mLzDxoZHMKS0zue832qwOTImEsXXapOTOPiqaE73TV/wEQCVCA1D1+QiMKo1HOUSfcOO WIW4Qsx+P1aGEuDC4OVsweDiH2AtwMHHdRKGus5wBmK0bbZ5ECVCwAsQjhaLcQ8tdE/Ti0C1 1KVkZXuHzMHjVGOYXec8rjNsjW/KXBMaHQcf2kBTBBA6d6loYU811TRVM1lVqWyi7UZBA3N/ txDlwBm7517sCLB//zTEYzv6950mqX0cw==
IronPort-HdrOrdr: A9a23:W8nGo6AmWZF6nUHlHelq55DYdb4zR+YMi2TDgXoBMSC9Ffbo8f xG/c5rsiMc5wx/ZJhNo7690ey7MBDhHP1OkO0s1NWZPDUO41HYV72KhLGKq1aNJ8S9zJ8+6U 4JSdkFNDSaNykesS+V2miFOudl6uOqtIqvguDTxWpsSwZFV4FMhj0SNi+rVmdNaE1jH5QWKL qwj/Arm9L+Ek5nE/hSCBE+LpH+Tnfw5e7bXSI=
X-Talos-CUID: 9a23:NII++2ieGJQ7Q2zZat5MrggajzJuS2PY3ireIhOEE3dMVoXNQHGr9fxGjJ87
X-Talos-MUID: 9a23:XD5LFgR70NjYCGwkRXT92AxBbsNDyp+/Vn0ng7BXqeeGLg1vbmI=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.16,225,1744070400"; d="scan'208";a="40627795"
Received: from MILG1WNEX02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (10.246.152.23) by MILG1WNEX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (10.246.152.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1748.10; Tue, 10 Jun 2025 14:45:52 -0400
Received: from MILG1WNEX02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([10.246.152.23]) by MILG1WNEX02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([10.246.152.23]) with mapi id 15.02.1748.010; Tue, 10 Jun 2025 14:45:52 -0400
From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
To: "klaus.frank@posteo.de" <klaus.frank@posteo.de>, "dns-privacy@ietf.org" <dns-privacy@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [EXTERNAL] [dns-privacy] Suggested RFC8310 improvements (authoritative DoTm better zone caching and lookup privacy)
Thread-Index: AQHb1liaOoiy0TWxGk6SuYGOit5UfLP8wtoA
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 18:45:52 +0000
Message-ID: <69d3ab78ece84e8399d24e298c2165b9@verisign.com>
References: <77dffb12-7ef5-463a-92bc-362f4cd85818@posteo.de>
In-Reply-To: <77dffb12-7ef5-463a-92bc-362f4cd85818@posteo.de>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.170.148.18]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID-Hash: PL26NO4LK7NSQL6LNQSEPTV62RQD4SR3
X-Message-ID-Hash: PL26NO4LK7NSQL6LNQSEPTV62RQD4SR3
X-MailFrom: shollenbeck@verisign.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dns-privacy.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [dns-privacy] Re: Suggested RFC8310 improvements (authoritative DoTm better zone caching and lookup privacy)
List-Id: Addition of privacy to the DNS protocol <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/FaMwmfiHZ75oKxQc1HT79cJ92FI>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dns-privacy-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dns-privacy-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dns-privacy-leave@ietf.org>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Klaus Frank <klaus.frank@posteo.de>
> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 4:29 PM
> To: dns-privacy@ietf.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [dns-privacy] Suggested RFC8310 improvements
> (authoritative DoTm better zone caching and lookup privacy)
>
> Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links
> or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
> safe.
>
> Hi,
>
> as it has become kinda quiet around
> draft-hal-adot-operational-considerations-02 by now I'd like to follow.
>
> Was there an active decission to not move forward with it?

[SAH] If I remember correctly, it was more a case of people thinking the draft was a little early.

Scott

v2.38.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status