Re: [dns-privacy] Some additional signalling ideas

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Mon, 01 April 2019 11:24 UTC

Return-Path: <dot@dotat.at>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FC401200E3 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 04:24:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jo-cJvXJ6CgE for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 04:24:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppsw-42.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-42.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.142]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81CA612006A for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 04:24:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://help.uis.cam.ac.uk/email-scanner-virus
Received: from grey.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.57.57]:54226) by ppsw-42.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.137]:25) with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) id 1hAv3c-000PPY-86 (Exim 4.91) (return-path <dot@dotat.at>); Mon, 01 Apr 2019 12:24:52 +0100
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2019 12:24:52 +0100
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusvaara@welho.com>
cc: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>, dns-privacy@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20190331142202.GA2307@LK-Perkele-VII>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1904011223210.13313@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <CACsn0ck-SNweieak5Fn7TOLLZTvsQNo6+w3nezxKuZPq0Z4QNA@mail.gmail.com> <20190331142202.GA2307@LK-Perkele-VII>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/URqRToxos-SzJIbn85SGOX4f0EE>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Some additional signalling ideas
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2019 11:24:56 -0000

Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusvaara@welho.com> wrote:
>
> Adding another RRtype with needed magic properties would take Standards
> Action (as expert review requires RRtype not to be magic) and then
> updating parent nameservers to be able to deal with the RRtype (since
> it can not be generically handled).

Don't forget the implications for EPP and the zoo of registrar UIs
and APIs.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
Malin: Southwest veering west, then becoming cyclonic later, 5 to 7. Moderate
or rough, becoming rough or very rough, occasionally high later. Rain then
wintry showers. Good, occasionally poor.