IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] DNS + 0-RTT

Colm MacCárthaigh <colm@allcosts.net> Mon, 11 April 2016 17:35 UTC

Return-Path: <colm@allcosts.net>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54A8312F262 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 10:35:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=allcosts-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X0tvuny1A5IJ for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 10:35:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x235.google.com (mail-yw0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D876612F260 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 10:35:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x235.google.com with SMTP id o66so127495380ywc.3 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 10:35:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=allcosts-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=WlJxKkdDw7NVDX8R2rUHFopkLthITsGlmv1Hpz0vgj4=; b=XyNH0ZU3T0grRNe/ZT2jFhzOdl+n2gucL6X+XPqo+7Cb6DJKHWwhS9KDy9oXtL0rR5 kdElWKL5sVhl0WZE7FyCSws7bJnMbgrMDuts4nf4p7t6sDrqlRjIC9KPVVQ/Ho1DU5HM dJY+yOp93ujdtQlMu/7ovy6YojHdXVBmKiGy0+YX4I9rZaRmGSVQIR1X54QJivhCeeFA c1n3N/YgGuFQ64cFtMvFQwKw1rbEsZixoKXRPX3jXAu1xN4Pq9/RIe8xtvkRUx+qe6tC d22ZdAuOvayHkPi9q301cfIYH0Jz/hRMMqFnSBL9vaBAbuZaOL3i/Xk+OwtAQIvX+GaK ljpA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=WlJxKkdDw7NVDX8R2rUHFopkLthITsGlmv1Hpz0vgj4=; b=GR41Z+Kyojjvr8MWu/Fu3Q7uYB+InJgWan++3mcEZy6kxD/XXFgGczgeA+M9eR7Myw c7kYRYAxE+PGicp0SO6fsolTCzXvlarWdINS/C3siDbeDUEqW/tOduYqnQnBRwWmw4nn dZWfsK4qBZitLk/Y0xhaaAdlGfYbxQzzZ+0fnwHP/ND8IMy3LgM7v+4uJceldA16VbIh rlzc1UrAHOgX6DrVUitJ8bBNUfMaWWqY3NuaOsRcSouKlX1jZjg8LVr+CTvZrvmp58oo Q77mO4UlY6PLvVza9fyHrgy4bUsacflJkMzREUs2h56zMKkCn0AZegb2TBXMrCJs7FhI TAqQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIMjgiM2+yKmWDVmF4SqvUZJJchOCV1fah5lZ3D7Qsw7Cu2oTLe24G46gBlcrQZHdsNgcI72CRoSYdpaw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.129.117.212 with SMTP id q203mr11003208ywc.243.1460396106151; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 10:35:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.129.88.86 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 10:35:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87egacuv6d.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net>
References: <5703F0CF.3050306@gmail.com> <87egaidh3y.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> <CAAF6GDcwGJmrPcFj_o+tCe7PTL5jFj=YZ+2LCgCTVZ=64CpOdA@mail.gmail.com> <87vb3rm7d9.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> <CAAF6GDfp9X0=P1j0xPBsSniHWNEi7Vu=xwR71GGbwJ9jbQkeGA@mail.gmail.com> <20160411145244.1f111f43@pallas.home.time-travellers.org> <87egacuv6d.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 10:35:06 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAF6GDep3ByYwH2ODpZcgxrsdhhoLuYkwcVAOGG_FGX5vRzeOQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Colm MacCárthaigh <colm@allcosts.net>
To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1147f6e623ac3f053038f79d"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/cPWOPPBYaFM4TBXDO-vPtcGFwzQ>
Cc: Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org>, "dns-privacy@ietf.org" <dns-privacy@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] DNS + 0-RTT
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 17:35:08 -0000

On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 6:33 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
wrote:

> I do like the simplicity and clarity of your proposal, but relying on
> client-side libraries to be fixed seems like a non-starter,
> unfortunately.  This is the classic IETF problem for any protocol with a
> deployed base; the folks who have the incentive and capacity to fix some
> endpoints aren't necessarily the folks who control the "right" endpoints
> to fix :/
>

Based on my reading of the charter, I think it's within the remit of this
WG to have a short I-D recommending random shuffling of RRs, permitting
fixed order, but "MUST NOT" for cyclic. For both recursive, and
authoritative servers. Happy to do it if folks don't think it's crazy.

-- 
Colm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email