Re: Pending issues for draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00

[Suresh Krishnaswamy <[e-mail]>]

Issue 5 "Embedded requirements" was meant to capture this. Do you  
have suggestions for any new requirements that fall under this  
category? Feel free to send text.

Thanks!
Suresh


On Apr 8, 2006, at 6:15 PM, Ben Laurie wrote:

> Suresh Krishnaswamy wrote:
>> In a short while I'll be sending out a list of pending issues  
>> (currently
>> 7 in number) for draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-00. All of
>> these issues were extracted from e-mails that were sent to  
>> namedroppers
>> relative to this topic over the last month.
>>
>> Sample text appears in most places. If you don't agree with the  
>> wording
>> in the sample text please speak up. In places where there is no  
>> sample
>> text, silence will be interpreted as an implicit agreement by the
>> Working Group to close this issue without further changes.
>>
>> The hope is to have each of these issues resolved over the next two
>> weeks so that the next version of the requirements draft can be  
>> rolled
>> out and last-called in the relatively near future.
>
> The issue that some of the definitions are actually requirements  
> appears
> to have been dropped.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ben.
>
> -- 
> http://www.links.org/
>
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to [e-mail]  
> with
> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>


--
to unsubscribe send a message to [e-mail] with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>