[DNSOP] Attrleaf table entry fields (was: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-04.txt)

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Fri, 23 March 2018 00:55 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A8EC12711E for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 17:55:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=dcrocker.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p_pu3MCC_nUs for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 17:55:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (simon.songbird.com [72.52.113.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84A17124217 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 17:55:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.168] (76-218-8-128.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.8.128]) (authenticated bits=0) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id w2N0umX9011378 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 22 Mar 2018 17:56:48 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=dcrocker.net; s=default; t=1521766609; bh=BbrgoGqHzUNnn6lZB1AQyxisV8jZsfBDFb3WR8gU2YQ=; h=Reply-To:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=QrILzAmfxvDizVxwAeyBGiKcOuMif5opFGUfmJD7tNDE4jwEDH6R1fjGQrKOnBtyE 44JmAoke3d232YhhsT76d9fF7gy2UZ9Sx8Wnrc83v95S4tzpTlhXJzc4X/MxgJip2j J8GdUyca9p6SMHFlpJd0cdRlywzoG6w0+77LQmYk=
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
To: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>, dnsop@ietf.org
References: <152175067742.4320.2858795077822055877@ietfa.amsl.com> <89bd2240-27ef-9e36-0f31-5fef0a808e7c@bellis.me.uk>
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <f7d0d74d-61bf-381e-2107-16b49197ddf8@dcrocker.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 17:55:20 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <89bd2240-27ef-9e36-0f31-5fef0a808e7c@bellis.me.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/AUmFEhhFlNHyQvJYYfT2fBYom2c>
Subject: [DNSOP] Attrleaf table entry fields (was: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-04.txt)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:55:31 -0000

On 3/22/2018 2:41 PM, Ray Bellis wrote:
> - the table formatting is pretty poor, do we really need any more
>    than just "NAME", "RR" and "REFERENCE"?   The ID field just seems
>    to be an alternate mnemonic for the (already unique) underscore
>    label itself

I've looked over the latest version of the table with the above in mind.

Wrestled a bit, and finally landed on 'yes', but want to record the 
thoughts justifying removing fields:

    ID: the _Node Name field really does serve that purpose well enough

    Purpose: The text that was there for most of the entries was 
mechanically redundant with information in other fields for the entry.

    Control: I've added overall text in a bulleted list before the 
table, that handles the 'authority' issue for each entry.

d/
-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net