Re: [DNSOP] Localhost - more reliable options?
Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com> Fri, 18 August 2017 03:19 UTC
Return-Path: <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4597E132719 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 20:19:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1VzJ9ABUE_ni for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 20:19:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x22d.google.com (mail-pg0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82963132707 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 20:19:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id t3so27225455pgt.0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 20:19:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=f6kRuyC6QNAwkh9SvX4lEtPjbDgEMyH9bJUmwFNDuZw=; b=H5GyAK4MclcTIM2f7ErUm5sm27Hv9rbWKlOPAsqb+8kjukd/rlUgjVT9h7OJ1Ifose Yhh9jqFt5vDLcpf+wnkdSti6An5kYjVP3dWoYDI65hUUWLft/OQFLrJ2aZ8Py8l1BwVu I3P52H6salo4yEY2mLTEo18WMaokL9tEQuK+3LnMK4CouXynOVbgUbHPqGpJhQUWiWod ajCB1gOKk6hFuDnuHTir0o7f14QRlkPrIWf6liaK424NrR8smJez2IeG+EpA9AR7q7GX 05BxT3SALVZYCrkDm9G/0XFw/3Vf05OMbGYCha6ONNLwdpUhVXXC0vwAuGdJnn3+BcVM sKzg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=f6kRuyC6QNAwkh9SvX4lEtPjbDgEMyH9bJUmwFNDuZw=; b=eK17uLMFJBeysWQwJq6ZNGSe9vKqLI2v6FnWRwnhisiZYAecnCEIv2b6L2xRUVdy16 bAQykwtc8JfTKixJUregIZV47mPrOnQPeSVpuKjkofvMh4x+aDNxDJUSA4Y9BOSMTFPJ zDjuiHHk/MUY2H2tDWK5CyRPOqjXJhpyA/Ptf4DRaJkv4YKnR5uYsTBBvYiyIDKn4BO7 JXsHOhFCFFoFSVzlf4gKyylXXT5ReLoPuZ+0o7cE3Jn7r+oKAg4gczCjlCAkaNp4gz4j QI6SYtB3Qv0gtUJqvA7nVeR4j1hQXNQsB2j+LmTsolFMjNFErNRkggQ+rPLQQh5AMMU1 G4eg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5jlIaQ29xk2VEUm4gnHsJE0n6Xg+JfWk99pgvNJVRwFs21c8w5f TuQYWD9BW13Su02+Y1Y=
X-Received: by 10.84.228.215 with SMTP id y23mr7934777pli.358.1503026368926; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 20:19:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.50.28.245] (mobile-166-177-250-16.mycingular.net. [166.177.250.16]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z8sm8068819pgs.25.2017.08.17.20.19.26 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 17 Aug 2017 20:19:27 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-89D1C8A3-3D03-4938-BC1F-FBD9597E50C4"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (14G60)
In-Reply-To: <69725356-F683-4FAF-A130-D08353D9169F@fugue.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 20:19:25 -0700
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <C224B53D-8967-4435-A8A5-CB03A891E661@gmail.com>
References: <CAH1iCiqr_9Om-jwRq6mLABH3cZ1D0qptLHVUQ1YtZn0ViQM=Mw@mail.gmail.com> <597FEBF7-7D11-4E50-9B79-63301914F75B@fugue.com> <CAH1iCip41ohOxKZdqEN-NOyRuv-d1knxuwR3LJNHOC+C6QJC3g@mail.gmail.com> <69725356-F683-4FAF-A130-D08353D9169F@fugue.com>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/D6wsv0oWcAsZK6kOvfTD8abE9f4>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Localhost - more reliable options?
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 03:19:31 -0000
Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 17, 2017, at 7:20 PM, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote: > > El 17 ag 2017, a les 21:54, Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com> va escriure: >> If you're trying to use "localhost", that means you're using some kind of name resolution, whether it be DNS, /etc/hosts, NIS+, or anything else. >> I'm suggesting that by using DNS, you can take advantage of what DNS has to offer, which includes potentially DNSSEC. > > DNSSEC can't work, or even be used, if you are spoofing localhost. If you used DNSSEC, the answer would fail validation. > Correct, so to clarify: Use DNSSEC, and use something other than "localhost." Does the host know its own name(s)? Brian
- [DNSOP] Localhost - more reliable options? Brian Dickson
- Re: [DNSOP] Localhost - more reliable options? Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] Localhost - more reliable options? Brian Dickson
- Re: [DNSOP] Localhost - more reliable options? Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] Localhost - more reliable options? Brian Dickson
- Re: [DNSOP] Localhost - more reliable options? Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] Localhost - more reliable options? Richard Barnes