Re: [DNSOP] Delegation into the interior of a zone?

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 27 December 2018 20:29 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C9F6130E8A for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Dec 2018 12:29:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=fVHV75z2; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=p1j9hvTP
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TjbsJe0vICF0 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Dec 2018 12:29:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB73D124BAA for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Dec 2018 12:29:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 99741 invoked from network); 27 Dec 2018 20:29:09 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=1859b.5c253615.k1812; bh=mBA+iQTwiCHJsPK1jw4xG8Sr3i4/TApSQGsUfkXpGMU=; b=fVHV75z2agIlAJJXh+lrRaLKL0xJudpQutXq9fOdZ9wjTnPDHi6WaCXE9mMYSh6sSpIZyLOLjFGvGYtIOtRRGQah8HB7TyKGWBdYLDrGUgvwYAkgtcNPBMjgGGZEAZu31090Fyn0R0WvqkiKgbXtNv6aPFr6LJcb6ddvrCnqK51kgNs4hHLIllm/q+YdFvLI9fHk5OXqE3Gs9DF6VlozXZa3gbPMYryb0TdQw1ru9/9LjldQKR7bWUnc33bHh5dm
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=1859b.5c253615.k1812; bh=mBA+iQTwiCHJsPK1jw4xG8Sr3i4/TApSQGsUfkXpGMU=; b=p1j9hvTP9m30i+vHrc5LcBJTatMrE7gNrrJQ32LqWunpkJi497+TDxJZr+Y/xIHO1VFj4MhaQOHIjfdzNrM928cC2rx26wztlMouNaKCwh7awFTvtidISZYYxUNqOAsYLjTuaDrUvoT2wR8AxvE/pmFxY8cGMtSiXbLNNA1tKGEQOa5AsHNyhxRihG36fR+XqC0j3zXmXV9Fy+ubchWcFukNw9+WAdVnX7RWWxgTVZI0u7PiM94KFgqXhfu9/nzB
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2/X.509/AEAD) via TCP6; 27 Dec 2018 20:29:09 -0000
Date: 27 Dec 2018 15:29:08 -0500
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.21.1812271528140.66959@ary.qy>
From: "John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: "Paul Vixie" <paul@redbarn.org>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <5C252F32.50503@redbarn.org>
References: <20181227192639.21372200BFBF3A@ary.qy> <5C252F32.50503@redbarn.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (OSX 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/FpA7TMqzq1i7pOlCAv8xBDKL-gA>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Delegation into the interior of a zone?
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2018 20:29:12 -0000

>>  $ORIGIN 1.1.1.in-addr.arpa.
>>  @ SOA blah
>>
>>  10 NS otherserver
>>  11 NS otherserver
>>  12 NS otherserver
>
> in RFC 2317 we do this with CNAME not NS. did the proponent explain why CNAME 
> wasn't suitable for her purposes?

He thinks $GENERATE confuses people.

Don't shoot, I'm just the messenger.

R's,
John