Re: [DNSOP] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-13: (with COMMENT)

Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> Wed, 10 October 2018 20:38 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@redbarn.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 576831277BB; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 13:38:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AYwnkcVP7k0i; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 13:38:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from family.redbarn.org (family.redbarn.org [IPv6:2001:559:8000:cd::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 603AC127B92; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 13:38:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.42.94] (unknown [5.33.13.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by family.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8EAC5892C6; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 20:38:33 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <5BBE6341.60703@redbarn.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 22:38:25 +0200
From: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 5.0.25 (Windows/20180328)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
CC: Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, benno@NLnetLabs.nl, dnsop@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf@ietf.org, dnsop-chairs@ietf.org
References: <153920040363.5832.16256057147624678157.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <39dee8f2-7536-3462-9dcc-55b241bbc016@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <39dee8f2-7536-3462-9dcc-55b241bbc016@dcrocker.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/IZlcxy3vcjDc0B0c25FiQcXiPmc>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-13: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 20:38:41 -0000


Dave Crocker wrote:
...
> which I believe is fully clear, given that there does not appear to me
> to be any candidate for intepreting 'one' other than 'resource record
> type', but worse, making the change you suggest would produce:
>
> DNS data semantics have been limited to the specification of particular
> resource record types, on the expectation that new resource record types
> would be added as needed. Unfortunately, the addition of new resource
> record types has proven extremely challenging, over the life of the DNS,
> with significant adoption and use barriers.

i can live with that.

>
> which is one heck of a lot of "resource record types" in the same, short
> paragraph.

truth hurts.

-- 
P Vixie