IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Changes since draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc4641bis-13

Miek Gieben <miek@miek.nl> Tue, 23 October 2012 13:29 UTC

Return-Path: <miekg@atoom.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92CD021F86FA for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 06:29:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.388
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.388 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.211, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zLRsarc-0w-7 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 06:29:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elektron.atoom.net (elektron.atoom.net [85.223.71.124]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A726721F86F8 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 06:29:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by elektron.atoom.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DA6933FF49; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 15:29:55 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 15:29:55 +0200
From: Miek Gieben <miek@miek.nl>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20121023132955.GH21418@miek.nl>
Mail-Followup-To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <507D691F.9000404@nlnetlabs.nl> <50868055.6030809@sidn.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="82evfD9Ogz2JrdWZ"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <50868055.6030809@sidn.nl>
User-Agent: Vim/Mutt/Linux
X-Home: http://www.miek.nl
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Changes since draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc4641bis-13
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 13:29:58 -0000

[ Quoting <antoin.verschuren@sidn.nl> in "Re: [DNSOP] Changes since draft-iet..." ]
> The paragraph is 4.3.2.
> The advice in this paragraph, which hasn't changed since 2009 when it

... so you couldn't have sent in a change sooner? ;-)

> was first written down, has been overtaken by new insight and practices.
> It advises registries to store only DS in stead of DNSKEY material in
> their database. 

The paragraph is a *suggestion* in a *bcp*. With the central point 
being that a child can choose its hash. I think this is a too minor
point to (again) stop the AUTH48 process.

 Regards,

-- 
    Miek Gieben                                               http://miek.nl

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email