Re: [DNSOP] Stephen Farrell's Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-negative-trust-anchors-10: (with COMMENT)

ebersman-ietf@dragon.net (Paul Ebersman) Mon, 20 July 2015 14:26 UTC

Return-Path: <ebersman-ietf@dragon.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8AC41A886F; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 07:26:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8xVRYo7-4qEc; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 07:26:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.dragon.net (mail.dragon.net [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:36::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECCD51A876B; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 07:26:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fafnir.remote.dragon.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.dragon.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94E753740304; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 07:26:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fafnir.remote.dragon.net (Postfix, from userid 501) id E24F11FC05C3; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 16:26:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from dhcp-b403.meeting.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fafnir.remote.dragon.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF2861FC05BF; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 16:26:45 +0200 (CEST)
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
From: ebersman-ietf@dragon.net
In-reply-to: <20150709121640.32189.20892.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20150709121640.32189.20892.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Comments: In-reply-to "Stephen Farrell" <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> message dated "Thu, 09 Jul 2015 05:16:40 -0700."
X-Mailer: MH-E 7.4.2; nmh 1.3; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 22)
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 16:26:45 +0200
Message-Id: <20150720142645.E24F11FC05C3@fafnir.remote.dragon.net>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Z-UIW7enusTJNvxxLo4lg7tJPTM>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 07:35:07 -0700
Cc: tjw.ietf@gmail.com, draft-ietf-dnsop-negative-trust-anchors.ad@ietf.org, dnsop-chairs@ietf.org, dnsop@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-dnsop-negative-trust-anchors.shepherd@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dnsop-negative-trust-anchors@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Stephen Farrell's Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-negative-trust-anchors-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 14:26:50 -0000

sfarrell> - section 2: "immediately restores" - well that depends on the
sfarrell> screw-up doesn't it? Or are you saying (where?) that an NTA
sfarrell> must only be put in place when the screw-up is specifically
sfarrell> and only about and because of DNSSEC and where ignoring DNSSEC
sfarrell> will result in things "working"?

Yes. This only addresses validation failures, not server/infrastructure
failures.