Re: [DNSOP] IETF 99: Call for agenda items, and draft cutoff reminder
Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr> Sat, 01 July 2017 21:13 UTC
Return-Path: <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F247129461; Sat, 1 Jul 2017 14:13:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0NCEFKOgbumA; Sat, 1 Jul 2017 14:13:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (givry.fdupont.fr [IPv6:2001:41d0:1:6d55:211:5bff:fe98:d51e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED8B9126BFD; Sat, 1 Jul 2017 14:13:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by givry.fdupont.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id v61KvH6N033745; Sat, 1 Jul 2017 22:57:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from dupont@givry.fdupont.fr)
Message-Id: <201707012057.v61KvH6N033745@givry.fdupont.fr>
From: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
To: tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, "dnsop-chairs@ietf.org" <dnsop-chairs@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of Fri, 30 Jun 2017 13:24:10 +0200. <CADyWQ+GHhrSix3==GBPUTtALUr1RP4GhX3fTvifh3nZdbOaT=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2017 22:57:17 +0200
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/_YlR8Uw54YPWomO2p-Nlk4bwGLc>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] IETF 99: Call for agenda items, and draft cutoff reminder
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2017 21:13:10 -0000
As you should know now there are some security problems in different TSIG implementations. IMHO the source of the problem is in TSIG RFCs so it is likely we'll have to discuss about publishing one or two Erratas. So even with a formal request for time in the agenda I believe we should consider to keep 5/10 mn for at least a presentation about this. Regards Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr PS: I expect more of the work to be done in this list (the problem impact is clearly operational).
- [DNSOP] IETF 99: Call for agenda items, and draft… Suzanne Woolf
- Re: [DNSOP] IETF 99: Call for agenda items, and d… tjw ietf
- Re: [DNSOP] IETF 99: Call for agenda items, and d… Francis Dupont