IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] ANAME in answer or additional section [issue #62]

Matthijs Mekking <matthijs@pletterpet.nl> Wed, 12 June 2019 07:59 UTC

Return-Path: <matthijs@pletterpet.nl>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D690812007A for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 00:59:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j4mD_PK1w_4W for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 00:59:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lb1-smtp-cloud7.xs4all.net (lb1-smtp-cloud7.xs4all.net [194.109.24.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A197120074 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 00:59:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:980:4eb1:1:5ca:272c:8848:ebce] ([IPv6:2001:980:4eb1:1:5ca:272c:8848:ebce]) by smtp-cloud7.xs4all.net with ESMTPSA id ayAihCMh45qKaayAjh6JBu; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 09:59:53 +0200
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <3b136e34-7ec0-e144-2c2a-0885185ec2b1@pletterpet.nl> <20190612000459.GA60387@isc.org> <CAOZSDgCB5wmnYEP4Kf6v7v6tY=F=jwX3zFS04vCt5GmwOq07Sw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJhMdTORCziZqzj-CSqNdztDK4HSEjAwz-Ye7mur86zyGbwnWw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Matthijs Mekking <matthijs@pletterpet.nl>
Message-ID: <7e9debaa-e0b8-d360-d73f-643f42f3da59@pletterpet.nl>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 09:59:52 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAJhMdTORCziZqzj-CSqNdztDK4HSEjAwz-Ye7mur86zyGbwnWw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfCvn0YNC4jGtLTEzg3XEZsg5Xc0NCQhYgNOOMvXDwi2DEg7MXLDkB+8UKF9r1/XAQNA7iRejjxuim0YoliLLYORlW3rCDlfFhoeQnSUoAHm8i0PkRUFR huhQiYdeW8NwntTDV0tT3ttphjcWT0sSpe3zfHE8MbB4IdHNUNyKODq06Ux7fzFesYmqJgX1dG5C5FO7h1mDpYHI6MbKMxx23ZrQDQe9BxHG2fdc2D/DE4pu LLCEKEf4hOZiqB63nB3hW5F0+KJ6AjYrlD+E9Nrrl0c=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/dxbLTXR4xIpPonhxb5iyankNEaU>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] ANAME in answer or additional section [issue #62]
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 07:59:59 -0000


On 6/12/19 4:41 AM, Joe Abley wrote:
> On Jun 11, 2019, at 20:11, Anthony Eden
> <anthony.eden=40dnsimple.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
>> I'm a fan of Michael's suggestion of using EDNS to signal that the authoritative should return ALIAS vs synthesizing. Any reason this won't work?
> 
> It won't work unless it's implemented. On a grand scale, then, it
> won't work unless it's implemented everywhere. The combined lifting of
> implementation, Interop and deployment is significant; is it worth it?

Is it worth it? No IMHO.

Matthijs


> 
> 
> Joe
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email