Re: [DNSOP] [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] tools issue? was Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-server-cookies-00.txt

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Mon, 09 September 2019 15:41 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55C6112008B; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 08:41:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.28
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.28 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pDLY-zXpoQsM; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 08:41:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC85412002F; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 08:41:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unescapeable.local ([47.186.30.41]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x89FflYB006465 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 9 Sep 2019 10:41:48 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1568043709; bh=N10rZ5fdvnCjjFHqA8cM5NyMoS7m+mZ1wQRcbSaPXKg=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=FIUpjnizMlqt9x7bfw97EuAYWE/y6imGB4GvrtStCjanpf+6MnBscaNPmeIawhZKs GD9stPsbbztbR5iDBELi6liOroQERhvegiALv/+JxxDxsUweSEQjTrD/TgrHGL2B8U jpkQ1j/JT8oBWOzWaMSfUi1BZID1P3uDUz9Tsubo=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.30.41] claimed to be unescapeable.local
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
Cc: Willem Toorop <willem@nlnetlabs.nl>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, IETF Tools Development <tools-development@ietf.org>
References: <156802477017.28268.17780089460480647573@ietfa.amsl.com> <86ff56cd-c936-0a81-b276-f4fd61635c7f@nlnetlabs.nl> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1909090848430.8758@bofh.nohats.ca> <97f8b8fb-91ad-ca74-b65b-d82698517203@nlnetlabs.nl> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1909090954540.4992@bofh.nohats.ca> <DB1D90A9-FB29-401F-9ED8-9700F99E0F9E@vigilsec.com>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <a876aa2c-e9cc-3f15-ce14-49c252376118@nostrum.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 10:41:47 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <DB1D90A9-FB29-401F-9ED8-9700F99E0F9E@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/wUYaV7UNwPF0B8ELzeWykIVvsDs>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] tools issue? was Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-server-cookies-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2019 15:41:51 -0000

This looks correct to me both on the datatracker and at tools.ietf.org.

If there's still something that's not right, please bring focus to it.

RjS

On 9/9/19 9:19 AM, Russ Housley wrote:
> Paul:
>
> The replaces and replaced-by information comes from the submitter.  In this case:
>
> 	Set submitter to "Willem Toorop <willem@nlnetlabs.nl>";, replaces to draft-sury-toorop-dnsop-server-cookies, draft-eastlake-dnsop-server-cookies
>
>
>>> Oh, sorry.  I indicated that it replaced the previous draft (and
>>> Donald's) that is not correct?
>> That normally ensures the datatracker does the tracking and the diffs,
>> but it does not look like that happened for this document. It appears
>> as a fresh submit without any history. Even weirder, it seems that the
>> old document indeed got the update reference:
>>
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sury-toorop-dnsop-server-cookies-00
>>
>> but the new document does not link back to the old one and misses the
>> diff.
>>
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-server-cookies-00
>>
>> I CC:ed the tools team on this who might be able to see/fix what happened?
> It looks like there are four drafts in the replaced-by history:
>
> 	draft-sury-toorop-dns-cookies-algorithms
> 	draft-sury-toorop-dnsop-server-cookies
> 	draft-eastlake-dnsop-server-cookies
> 	draft-ietf-dnsop-server-cookies
>
> The history tab of draft-ietf-dnsop-server-cookies shows all four, allowing the comparison of the last one to any of the earlier ones.
>
> Russ
>
> _______________________________________________
> TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT mailing list
> TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-development