Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for: draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-update

fujiwara@jprs.co.jp Mon, 15 October 2018 15:05 UTC

Return-Path: <fujiwara@jprs.co.jp>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07D76128BAC for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 08:05:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PBMC6GNTcdZD for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 08:05:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from off-send01.osa.jprs.co.jp (off-send01.osa.jprs.co.jp [IPv6:2001:218:3001:17::10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCFF1130E79 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 08:05:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from off-sendsmg01.osa.jprs.co.jp (off-sendsmg01.osa.jprs.co.jp [172.23.8.61]) by off-send01.osa.jprs.co.jp (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w9FF4wKU002138; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 00:04:58 +0900
Received: from off-sendsmg01.osa.jprs.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss71 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 414E91800B6; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 00:04:58 +0900 (JST)
Received: from localhost (off-cpu05.osa.jprs.co.jp [172.23.4.15]) by off-sendsmg01.osa.jprs.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FF831800B2; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 00:04:58 +0900 (JST)
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 00:04:57 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <20181016.000457.1043014259425988884.fujiwara@jprs.co.jp>
To: tjw.ietf@gmail.com
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
From: fujiwara@jprs.co.jp
In-Reply-To: <CADyWQ+Eq5OV5gi90-oCgAJ53yQ6-pw6+Aa+jDyoMLF8dSoZY_A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADyWQ+GqybVhe6c-L_LyFB4wQPxOhOfMy_uwv46nSc2Y5-7FEQ@mail.gmail.com> <CADyWQ+Eq5OV5gi90-oCgAJ53yQ6-pw6+Aa+jDyoMLF8dSoZY_A@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.6 on Emacs 24.4 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1690-8.2.0.1013-24158.000
X-TM-AS-Result: No--3.680-5.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--3.680-5.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: 2v/bjopQw/dCXIGdsOwlUu5i6weAmSDKZggZX8gYmrWdCqKtxM6bhzIl dYjRB7C5T+8v17QjdI3lwwgM+xRB5IoNrmb7m9Z4lTsGW3DmpUt9LQinZ4QefL6qvLNjDYTwzht qOA7SSC+25o8uteNIwbL1D3ZkqVjaoPPe4M9v8m5QSFbL1bvQASdET58jp62SPXw/h3JeyCe/VP L4K57pfpHanJ7rwIbMif2sXghWOxd/KMg0g+RdYKUmBxjLreCkyJUcfd82prjx3kVKXqfnFv9b3 keXGmzpUARAPI1OA8tkfd/zPGWwsvvpR1kNBhYY7Y82MSiAt9kRjKrH98r/tQ==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/yfOGDAAfXwYAELv79-Z6GQpkqYQ>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for: draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-update
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 15:05:05 -0000

WGLC comment to draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-update-02

Section 3.2 is "recommendations for operators".

There is texts that discuss ECDSAP256SHA256 only in section 3.2.
However, RSASHA256 is still usable.
Please add text about other algorithms.
if there is a table similar to section 3.1, it will help operators.

For example,
                 choice of                | choice of
                 sigining algorithm (now) | sigining algorithm (2 years Later)
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  RSASHA1*        MUST NOT                | MUST NOT
  RSASHA256       usable                  | usable/consider change to EC*/Ed*
  ECDSAP256*      usable                  | usable
  Ed25519         MAY                     | usable


Regards,

--
Kazunori Fujiwara, JPRS <fujiwara@jprs.co.jp>;