Re: [dnssd] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnssd-requirements-04.txt

"Hosnieh Rafiee" <ietf@rozanak.com> Wed, 08 October 2014 19:53 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@rozanak.com>
X-Original-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DB721A0147 for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 12:53:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.014
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.014 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vCvakN8NKpao for <dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 12:53:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.rozanak.com (mail.rozanak.com [IPv6:2a01:238:42ad:1500:aa19:4238:e48f:61cf]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92CFA1A017A for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 12:53:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mail.rozanak.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDC5B566081A for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 19:53:46 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rozanak.com
Received: from mail.rozanak.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.iknowlaws.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n72LzcQzW_Rk for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 21:53:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from kopoli (p5B343E50.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [91.52.62.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.rozanak.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B87AD566072E for <dnssd@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 21:53:15 +0200 (CEST)
From: Hosnieh Rafiee <ietf@rozanak.com>
To: dnssd@ietf.org
References: <20141008142332.23007.82682.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20141008142332.23007.82682.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 21:53:13 +0200
Message-ID: <009401cfe331$7f6e9550$7e4bbff0$@rozanak.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQEYlwqdNPK+c0HRWDVZ2khoADAmI52VL67A
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnssd/r5oD-HoUJvLMDbUJRh6J7YZ4qZc
Subject: Re: [dnssd] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnssd-requirements-04.txt
X-BeenThere: dnssd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to Bonjour \(mDNS and DNS-SD\) for routed networks." <dnssd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnssd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnssd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 19:53:51 -0000

Hi,

I reviewed this draft and found it well written and good coverage.
I only want to raise two questions here. Since this document considered all
different devices and different environemnt, does it make sense to also care
about Cloud environment and how DNS-SD suppose to work there ? I am asking
because this is the future of our networks and with high speed we are moving
toward it. 

My next question is that I thought in the last IETF, (as I raised this
question during my presentation) the WG decided to move all threat analysis
in the separate document that is current threat analysis draft. I still see
there are improved version of threat analysis at the requirement draft. What
is the decision here and how do you want to do it?


Thanks,
Best,
Hosnieh