Re: [Doh] How to start HTTP/2?

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Wed, 17 January 2018 08:23 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D47DC124C27 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 00:23:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ldy_ysv7kQP7 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 00:23:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.bortzmeyer.org (aetius.bortzmeyer.org [217.70.190.232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8A9F124234 for <doh@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 00:23:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id 9065131D1B; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 09:22:59 +0100 (CET)
Received: by godin (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 417ECEC0B80; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 09:18:23 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 09:18:23 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
Cc: doh@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20180117081823.GA23686@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
References: <20180116150246.dvr3d3nstozqfadn@nic.fr> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1801161607110.20551@tvnag.unkk.fr> <20180116152145.qhgqoo3dqmebb6aa@nic.fr> <CAOdDvNqTB=RxtJ5+ykbN_4KKhZS=_DnPdpK3yPh0cL2ey-7GKA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAOdDvNqTB=RxtJ5+ykbN_4KKhZS=_DnPdpK3yPh0cL2ey-7GKA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Ubuntu 16.04 (xenial)
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/nZ_gcLaMvPpg-mywrsRMF9zDxyM>
Subject: Re: [Doh] How to start HTTP/2?
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 08:23:02 -0000

On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 10:29:54AM -0500,
 Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com> wrote 
 a message of 83 lines which said:

> imo, no.. a] h2 isn't required.. and even where its a should it is h2 or
> its successors. successors might do it differently.
...
> c] h2 can be extended in ways that could conflict with that language. I
> don't see the value in forcing those extensions to be aware enough to also
> extend DoH.

OK, I understand. But can it raise interoperability issues? If a
client tries one way and the server does not understand it, won't it
mean at least a delay in noticing and fixing the problem?

Martin Thomson said it is not a problem because everyone uses TLS and
ALPN, anyway. But it contradicts what you say about the possibility of
future changes using other techniques.