[Doh] Minor issues on word usage in draft-05

Star Brilliant <m13253@hotmail.com> Tue, 03 April 2018 06:41 UTC

Return-Path: <m13253@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4DF812E040 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Apr 2018 23:41:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.876
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.876 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2=0.874, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=hotmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nGAKY4shEssX for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Apr 2018 23:41:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM04-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092010101.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.10.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66DEE12E03C for <doh@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Apr 2018 23:41:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=cUZTOO0LC2aE0yzQ+9hV0MhG4/DVTeRUYjIKGbL778E=; b=mHVxEyBSzSOoJvxoqSUAm651Coptva8K9L5OsroeCQJoIBuRqwVnMZyobJ7CHSpY3XYSDZchvBpL6GT3pzlny6uHnmpd6ZIkkRqOC7bsBbd7nS1KILOqZf3EIkLsF5EgC1s1QneZnxL0GEumnHYOALED2i+Vfn4k074D1G6HXiwobrYPK2TZrYil68ik77QEaed30bnrl9O2b1sqexKfulih8uhYCOyFA42IRFMF8Hm1l20tPFYnZGhYPAxupXo+JLaMJ4WxhZmFTHFxKX7ZDFYb5asp0e5TxsYfSYuBketDVpr28tDCIj560dxB9a6kOFJ8ORv9/wf5Q0PuTm0rdg==
Received: from CO1NAM04FT035.eop-NAM04.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.90.52) by CO1NAM04HT043.eop-NAM04.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.90.182) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.20.631.7; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 06:41:26 +0000
Received: from BYAPR19MB2248.namprd19.prod.outlook.com (10.152.90.53) by CO1NAM04FT035.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.90.123) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.653.8 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 06:41:26 +0000
Received: from BYAPR19MB2248.namprd19.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::49ab:17a3:df4c:17d9]) by BYAPR19MB2248.namprd19.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::49ab:17a3:df4c:17d9%13]) with mapi id 15.20.0631.013; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 06:41:26 +0000
From: Star Brilliant <m13253@hotmail.com>
To: "doh@ietf.org" <doh@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Minor issues on word usage in draft-05
Thread-Index: AQHTyxXXXlpoyg1H/UiJP+89bx+YTQ==
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 06:41:26 +0000
Message-ID: <BYAPR19MB2248EEE93A81C23BB9EC54F494A50@BYAPR19MB2248.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:E88A8452CE2D8FAAB333AA12DFAD477FC23D4E129674E461A1C8A06735FEA05B; UpperCasedChecksum:BCEA0354C1E0BDE86B792CDD1A4C17F8215B0E61D07734C325B3D6E447B818B3; SizeAsReceived:6932; Count:44
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-tmn: [1oxmGm43xlGscxZxEECJMeZOuviHLhAmRvsAJ3dheYr7l2pCr8BOiA==]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; CO1NAM04HT043; 7:ytNxPuBFruk0HiymgL51s+JgkEoX1O8ju2jIL1qo8W5uRGqx+kiepgeNLMxzWzCVTuBmTpN+Oub9AmP6TJFgGnuI/OsF/rLnAHw/q0xSFoH4QwEiAwjCZRrWfsq1hMeC4925ZbqKc2myfo3rtbqXudZnmmMZVu8JX/I6O2Y+Tr1tKH8UyRIT9VjkNPXHKIvrzoPaUhy/9jMSr+iKK1OcddHAZgiD4DcubZTcbTUIA7lrMt1jml4Y56MTTjnKLE2Z
x-incomingheadercount: 44
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(201702061078)(5061506573)(5061507331)(1603103135)(2017031320274)(2017031324274)(2017031323274)(2017031322404)(1601125374)(1603101448)(1701031045); SRVR:CO1NAM04HT043;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: CO1NAM04HT043:
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 2774e40f-91f6-472b-bc71-08d5992dec9a
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(444000031); SRVR:CO1NAM04HT043; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:CO1NAM04HT043;
x-forefront-prvs: 0631F0BC3D
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(7070007)(98901004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1901; SCL:1; SRVR:CO1NAM04HT043; H:BYAPR19MB2248.namprd19.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: wzbmGZ2msQVxCFJagMBmdIRC3YZSHeT/QfqxyDXNjPS+xQZ10bwt0HUyVD2udamvPFfNShmtTHV5o34hyfkei3dWLhOeAR5GhjmbB1vefxiw828SMGyp/AM43ER7nIpHBEu22haa2oNkJmyjqwLs1DV2CA0fINXIxQpe1ehsu/5UxfiycUm8V9jPWgBXB9Cs
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: hotmail.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 2774e40f-91f6-472b-bc71-08d5992dec9a
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 03 Apr 2018 06:41:26.4310 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CO1NAM04HT043
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/ylQn-t77zoLNbIE9_dNGZyvTX30>
Subject: [Doh] Minor issues on word usage in draft-05
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 06:41:29 -0000

Hello DOHWG,

In the latest draft-05, I found several minor issues on word usage.

In Section 4,

> The URI template defined in this document is processed without any
> variables for requests using POST, and with the single variable "dns"
> for requests using GET.  The value of the dns parameter is the
> content of the request (as described in Section 4.1), encoded with
> base64url [RFC4648].

Issue 1: I found the phrase "URI template" is spelled with a lower "t", where all other occurrences of this phrase is spelled with an upper "T". Is this a typo?

Issue 2: I suggest we change the word "and" in Line 2 to "or", for the reason that an HTTP request could not be both GET and POST.

Thanks.

-- 
Star Brilliant
m13253@hotmail.com