Re: [Dots] IPR Check for draft-ietf-dots-architecture

Flemming Andreasen <fandreas@cisco.com> Mon, 04 February 2019 22:25 UTC

Return-Path: <fandreas@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FE6312867A for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 14:25:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -19.053
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-19.053 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-4.553, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id voaP7U4Thg0C for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 14:25:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49B8C127598 for <dots@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 14:25:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2175; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1549319110; x=1550528710; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to; bh=WVgogOaoZEk32P6om0bYcJ3rx0s/E0yNwOP3c4bxUXc=; b=VmPQ3mj2saBkVdTKBF3euSpONMS9x/Ndzz18LiOeUWUYIZRPMoS/o0R5 t1NdhVEGaIn1rEm+oByQ5ws4HK59m5KiR92izryEcQKE5kSffb0sYFmRu v7iK/4WfpyWtxeQnJkbfNpz/K2AegkLsC40Z4agkPMEraK9CSzVGYzp/K w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CGAABgulhc/5RdJa0ZAUoaAQEBAQECAQEBAQcCAQEBAYFlAoICZ4EDJ4QDlA+BYC2JNYhrh2oNGAEKhEkCgyAiOBIBAwEBAgEBAm0cDIVLAQEBAwEBIUsbCwQBCQQGKgICJyIOBgEMBgIBAYMeAYF0DQ+NPZ16gS8fhSWEbgWMQReBQD+BOIJrgx4BAYRqglcCkHY6hWKLYAmLE4chBhmBbIVBgxeIAIojkVyBXSGBVk0jFTuCbIsehV0hAzCOdwEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,560,1539648000"; d="scan'208,217";a="235097968"
Received: from rcdn-core-12.cisco.com ([173.37.93.148]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Feb 2019 22:25:09 +0000
Received: from [10.118.10.18] (rtp-fandreas-2-881-ap.cisco.com [10.118.10.18]) by rcdn-core-12.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x14MP84N032576; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 22:25:08 GMT
To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>, "dots@ietf.org" <dots@ietf.org>
References: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC01857A7DC9@marathon>
From: Flemming Andreasen <fandreas@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <57f63ebd-fdc9-ec79-5bf3-487a520dbf80@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2019 17:25:08 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC01857A7DC9@marathon>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------DFD0D1295355915908FFFC32"
Content-Language: en-US
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.118.10.18, rtp-fandreas-2-881-ap.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-12.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/22rdjU0yT0o0ax86F_pj-90sZFs>
Subject: Re: [Dots] IPR Check for draft-ietf-dots-architecture
X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots/>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2019 22:25:12 -0000

Confirmed on my part.

Thanks

-- Flemming

On 2/4/19 2:11 PM, Roman Danyliw wrote:
> Hello!
>
> In order to help preparing the shepherd write-up for draft-ietf-dots-architecture, can you please answer the following question on list:
>
> =====
> (7) Has each author confirmed that any and all appropriate IPR disclosures
> required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79 have
> already been filed. If not, explain why?
> =====
>
> Thanks,
> Roman
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dots mailing list
> Dots@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots
> .
>