[Dots] OP-007: draft-ietf-dots-requirements

<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Tue, 02 May 2017 07:45 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 005CF129B59 for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 May 2017 00:45:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gT5j7Or_1D-W for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 May 2017 00:45:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (mta241.mail.business.static.orange.com [80.12.66.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23AF212EC33 for <dots@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 May 2017 00:40:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfedar01.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.2]) by opfedar25.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 042CA120344; Tue, 2 May 2017 09:40:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme3.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.50.61]) by opfedar01.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id DB11C160067; Tue, 2 May 2017 09:40:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from OPEXCNORMAD.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::f1a0:3c6b:bc7b:3aaf]) by OPEXCNORM2F.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::994e:c3e:1d70:d2b4%21]) with mapi id 14.03.0339.000; Tue, 2 May 2017 09:40:41 +0200
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: "Mortensen, Andrew" <amortensen@arbor.net>
CC: "dots@ietf.org" <dots@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: OP-007: draft-ietf-dots-requirements
Thread-Index: AdLDF2VGW573UG+nRS2aHg18jfBFkg==
Date: Tue, 02 May 2017 07:40:41 +0000
Message-ID: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933009E5F41B@OPEXCNORMAD.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.168.234.5]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933009E5F41BOPEXCNORMADcorp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/A97rdIAn5i57saub20DRshla5zI>
Subject: [Dots] OP-007: draft-ietf-dots-requirements
X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots/>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 May 2017 07:46:00 -0000

Re-,


   OP-007  Mitigation Efficacy: When a mitigation request by a DOTS

      client is active, DOTS clients SHOULD transmit a metric of

      perceived mitigation efficacy to the DOTS server, per "Automatic

      or Operator-Assisted CPE or PE Mitigators Request Upstream DDoS

      Mitigation Services" in [I-D.ietf-dots-use-cases<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dots-requirements-04#ref-I-D.ietf-dots-use-cases>].  DOTS servers

      MAY use the efficacy metric to adjust countermeasures activated on

      a mitigator on behalf of a DOTS client.



The use case draft does not include that discussion. I think that deleting the text in red may be just fine:

NEW:


   OP-007  Mitigation Efficacy: When a mitigation request by a DOTS

      client is active, DOTS clients SHOULD transmit a metric of

      perceived mitigation efficacy to the DOTS server.  DOTS servers

      MAY use the efficacy metric to adjust countermeasures activated on

      a mitigator on behalf of a DOTS client.



Thank you.



Cheers,

Med