[dtn] RFC5050 obsolete status

Rick Taylor <rick@tropicalstormsoftware.com> Wed, 15 January 2020 17:14 UTC

Return-Path: <rick@tropicalstormsoftware.com>
X-Original-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74ECB1208A0 for <dtn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 09:14:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1F-Aujs7eciS for <dtn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 09:14:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.tropicalstormsoftware.com (mail.tropicalstormsoftware.com [188.94.42.120]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32B201208A6 for <dtn@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 09:14:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tss-server1.home.tropicalstormsoftware.com ([fe80::48e4:acbb:6065:8168]) by tss-server1.home.tropicalstormsoftware.com ([fe80::48e4:acbb:6065:8168%16]) with mapi id 14.03.0468.000; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 17:14:23 +0000
From: Rick Taylor <rick@tropicalstormsoftware.com>
To: "dtn@ietf.org" <dtn@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: RFC5050 obsolete status
Thread-Index: AQHVy8c6KMLIIqoIM06uJ/2BCDIVqg==
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 17:14:22 +0000
Message-ID: <73db00372156cc89cb0282a907e35b503ce2174a.camel@tropicalstormsoftware.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Evolution 3.34.1-2
x-originating-ip: [10.10.1.5]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <2C80E7B506E598439B071F6C882BBC29@home.tropicalstormsoftware.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn/FOeM2fr4_-4KitHGhD2dPA49ZRE>
Subject: [dtn] RFC5050 obsolete status
X-BeenThere: dtn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Delay Tolerant Networking \(DTN\) discussion list at the IETF." <dtn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dtn/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 17:14:34 -0000

Dear Working Group,

It has been noted by our AD that after the call for consensus on
obsoleting RFC5050, the chairs failed to make an announcement on the
result.

This message is to make that announcement, namely:

* Having consulted with the IETF ADs and IRTF, there now exists a
mechanism whereby an IETF document can obsolete an IRTF document, and
draft-ietf-dtn-bpbis will request that RFC5050 be marked as obsolete.

* As the working group charter is updated, we will state clearly that
there is no intent to work on or make compatible work with RFC5050 and
related RFCs.

* DTN working group document authors have reviewed the IANA registries
as they are today and have requested whatever modifications needed,
which may include changing the policies, the content, the rules, etc. 
These changes are documented in draft-ietf-dtn-bpbis.

Kind Regards,

Rick and Marc, co-chairs