IETF Logo Mail Archive

[dtn] BPv7 bundle flags

Brian Sipos <BSipos@rkf-eng.com> Sat, 13 April 2019 16:14 UTC

Return-Path: <BSipos@rkf-eng.com>
X-Original-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C66912023B for <dtn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 09:14:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=rkfeng.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WmESS7wv5qC3 for <dtn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 09:14:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM04-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr690064.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.69.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EECF11207D2 for <dtn@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 09:13:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rkfeng.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-rkfeng-com0i; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=NFk/qt1a5+vR0B3706NkaO+8FoxgdtzMoYjFEcSl2Vs=; b=A+PZTWA+r7WihzkM/D46dg8cdUT/N8USVLE1bPxLekOPpxLJ4s6MPE+dX7z/owGFd2PE4qCazNbpo2pqLl4y1Dsoi0+kY5fKVgGLx9LGEVSVDJiN/UjIFOzQ209mNr4vSGio/gpZ7HMhBpvDq8D2QbcFxyMf3uKmEetCtYXkp+Y=
Received: from CY4PR1301MB2039.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (10.171.240.14) by CY4PR1301MB2184.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (10.171.220.38) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1792.11; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 16:13:58 +0000
Received: from CY4PR1301MB2039.namprd13.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c72:6b85:66ca:845c]) by CY4PR1301MB2039.namprd13.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c72:6b85:66ca:845c%3]) with mapi id 15.20.1792.009; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 16:13:58 +0000
From: Brian Sipos <BSipos@rkf-eng.com>
To: Scott Burleigh <scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov>, "dtn@ietf.org" <dtn@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: BPv7 bundle flags
Thread-Index: AQHU8hPmU2110ssDa0u6iOwFIgEuuQ==
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2019 16:13:58 +0000
Message-ID: <004d51214bec07c40494ba6ecdfce32fd79e39bf.camel@rkf-eng.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [73.250.91.32]
x-mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 (3.28.5-3.fc28)
x-clientproxiedby: MN2PR12CA0015.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:a8::28) To CY4PR1301MB2039.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:910:48::14)
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=BSipos@rkf-eng.com;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: be1c7dee-9680-4967-c36e-08d6c02b087b
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(7021145)(8989299)(4534185)(7022145)(4603075)(4627221)(201702281549075)(8990200)(7048125)(7024125)(7027125)(7023125)(5600139)(711020)(4605104)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:CY4PR1301MB2184;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: CY4PR1301MB2184:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CY4PR1301MB2184E0B1E81D246F029134E99F290@CY4PR1301MB2184.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
x-forefront-prvs: 00064751B6
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(366004)(396003)(346002)(39830400003)(136003)(376002)(199004)(189003)(71190400001)(386003)(66066001)(508600001)(106356001)(305945005)(4744005)(256004)(186003)(25786009)(8936002)(6506007)(50226002)(2501003)(99286004)(118296001)(476003)(72206003)(7736002)(14454004)(2616005)(105586002)(36756003)(68736007)(102836004)(7116003)(6512007)(6116002)(316002)(53936002)(97736004)(6436002)(71200400001)(86362001)(2906002)(8676002)(26005)(80792005)(110136005)(486006)(6486002)(81166006)(52116002)(5660300002)(3846002)(81156014)(99106002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:CY4PR1301MB2184; H:CY4PR1301MB2039.namprd13.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: rkf-eng.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: TZL4WDuiXtVmlGVj/Jh5YtV6VnGGZvzSGHFrsWphRZWm2uVLRUHyq6umuEefCUAFcfovssBt9SVDaIXXFzuAyJt/h8l6L2/JG7HqmvceGfdHOoW/4HJoY+gZOXi09kFKSEKIEII37DVQEuhYn+QYypcQF40EBlafebxkDgPTXALOEtsB27wBPcrlEUTZkvV6YqGSZiW9I+nvWXyj6YQ2dgpZajaj6El25oCymobwuUrKXWtt/gMPUf1tvNPXhtCR16woLjvBkvZ38Vw966PjFW56fl6/9hRnkTLdGIKZog98b60zXgtfvzdFdnj6LSl8oOubZ9yUBGsA8H0+YyNZmmVj66it8kc3duJQ/eUcwFlfppM8oS1py/uC4RaiBpVhRBNEqqbJ5HXEBpSfu5vuKds6ZAmQzE0X4Ad5LmoV9ws=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <92FDB00768571D478FE4AEBD1F5A0E48@namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: rkf-eng.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: be1c7dee-9680-4967-c36e-08d6c02b087b
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 13 Apr 2019 16:13:58.0601 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 4ed8b15b-911f-42bc-8524-d89148858535
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CY4PR1301MB2184
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn/qgIZY9Pqqaj3r7LDYdPoJdJQmBo>
Subject: [dtn] BPv7 bundle flags
X-BeenThere: dtn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Delay Tolerant Networking \(DTN\) discussion list at the IETF." <dtn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dtn/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2019 16:14:02 -0000

Scott,
As of BPbis -12 draft, there is a bundle flag "bundle contains a Manifest block" which seems to not
really serve any purpose, especially because the block type is not defined in the draft. The other
flags indicate how the bundle is to be handled or reported-about, but I don't see what this flag is
supposed to influence. If the bundle does in fact contain a manifest block then that should be
evident from the presence of that block type itself.

Should this flag really be defined in bpbis, or just reserved for later use? And is there really a
use for a flag even when the block type is defined?
Thanks,
Brian S.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email