IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Ecn-in-quic] ECN-in-Quic w/ ABE

rs.ietf@gmx.at Thu, 22 March 2018 18:47 UTC

Return-Path: <rs.ietf@gmx.at>
X-Original-To: ecn-in-quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecn-in-quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AF98126BF7 for <ecn-in-quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 11:47:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j8_KPNB1Jt1m for <ecn-in-quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 11:47:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BA631242EA for <ecn-in-quic@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 11:47:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [31.133.142.122] ([31.133.142.122]) by msvc-mesg-gmx123.server.lan (via HTTP); Thu, 22 Mar 2018 19:47:02 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <trinity-a0c1c974-9910-48fc-8fa7-a1d77c9349c8-1521744422645@msvc-mesg-gmx123>
From: rs.ietf@gmx.at
To: ecn-in-quic@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Importance: normal
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 19:47:02 +0100
X-Priority: 3
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:Md5EKYNXMfoG/dRGoaJyzQR2MNzNXsOn/v6xwdqb6hi cNPl/lgNPMTjiAd4go2cqiU29Ruzn5Cm+8kZDErbBn+NIWbIhu wsO1+OqGDOfJgLO0mgZL6kcgG7LDMjqA0dFSHx6R0SocPMDD9t Hiutbt1qRcI/3Wq0KwhMP8cahjtRazmwUNKZn763dqgHdSQq4t maekGOaT8/9QHRPyUe3I2jQa2Hd91rdzzjFEHs6fXAiXydxbAP 9ehzGYfWn5DU/lHwRQXnNEZPRL+7RBQO2QFpOPA1bEEla9gp/A kxE1fY2+FqBnkjfvIXH0OwNfLEG
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:zpLWdXv6vJk=:qe54XCbmr2kr5zW1QRpvix vE7HX3wZIzGufrCxMcm4IkKJDoZvs6l34x4sgNd8GIBYHEkvJyP4dA1q3q55FkOHRHJoQYlgs xAV4vLirQzBEgmA4UEl+zukr1oVPTEp8bR46LZ5v21QC0SjOLaBEPPQteIC03LOnS551O/KtO lHi2xNqoCFutsOOlcYYcP3AWeU+KpTi+M6OegjbPSrNDwFZt89wER7PD9pPKqShTSM9+A0mcf 8Z9DXnh63vC8W7AIhyZzJ0erQ7A5PH7pZ9CDlgrX/omyLIv7sNDl/3wR6to4TaCYaFK3CsrBg dnvm4qkqfAiHWCA9PR2a5FZ0qMtazUYXyYRoBrZePGJJhb0GvARS3upzKjfFzZJUjdBvtntH/ DO2HF3tXr6aUnqa2vLn5f0VhSpSY89kyvBGyyJ4Qbx/EMp4iMCY5CbZskGazTAeiGgKo49IrV y/hKn8JQhHN7SVWyR4Tj1e7nB17FEX1NGg0mtJmyR2HnRzj+Zj1SbbkR6Xs9ZFSDeyWiAVOEL dJx4AnlFxjDCY0BcIxhzDM=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ecn-in-quic/-jlkq1CeGjpmqXH4sKlWLtbOQx4>
Subject: [Ecn-in-quic] ECN-in-Quic w/ ABE
X-BeenThere: ecn-in-quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "ECN in the QUIC protocol discussion list." <ecn-in-quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ecn-in-quic>, <mailto:ecn-in-quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ecn-in-quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:ecn-in-quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecn-in-quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecn-in-quic>, <mailto:ecn-in-quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 18:47:10 -0000

Just a quick note to those present here:

ABE (Alternative Backoff for ECN) is past WGLC in TCPM, allowing a differntiated CC control between ECN and Loss - to incentivise the deployment of ECN.

Since Quic uses Cubic, the guidance given there for differential reaction between loss and ECN marks would be directly applicable...

Any thoughts?

Best regards,
  Richard

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email