Re: [Ecrit] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ecrit-ecall-26.txt

[Randall Gellens <[e-mail]>]

At 2:19 PM -0500 2/12/17, Paul Kyzivat wrote:

>  Question: is there intent to remove the requirement to wrap the MSD 
> in a multipart body once the the work in sipcore completes? Is it 
> your goal to future proof this text so it need not be changed to 
> accomplish that?

I think there is not much actual benefit to removing the requirement, 
while there is some downside: it would make the draft dependent on 
the content-id draft, and it would require further changes in other 
SDO work (e.g., 3GPP) that includes the requirement.  So I'd suggest 
we leave it is.

-- 
Randall Gellens
Opinions are personal;    facts are suspect;    I speak for myself only
-------------- Randomly selected tag: ---------------
The average man does not know what to do with his life, yet wants
another one which will last forever.             --Anatole France