[edu-team] IETF 98 survey results & plans for IETF 99
Mirjam Kuehne <mir@ripe.net> Thu, 18 May 2017 14:28 UTC
Return-Path: <mir@ripe.net>
X-Original-To: edu-team@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: edu-team@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D1B112EA7F for <edu-team@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 May 2017 07:28:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oXYhcvT_mkAs for <edu-team@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 May 2017 07:28:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from molamola.ripe.net (molamola.ripe.net [IPv6:2001:67c:2e8:11::c100:1371]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6332E129482 for <edu-team@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 May 2017 07:23:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nene.ripe.net ([193.0.23.10]) by molamola.ripe.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.88) (envelope-from <mir@ripe.net>) id 1dBMKx-000ADr-UC for edu-team@ietf.org; Thu, 18 May 2017 16:23:33 +0200
Received: from sslvpn.ipv6.ripe.net ([2001:67c:2e8:9::c100:14e6] helo=guest4.guestnet.ripe.net) by nene.ripe.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <mir@ripe.net>) id 1dBMKx-0005Lb-Q7 for edu-team@ietf.org; Thu, 18 May 2017 16:23:31 +0200
References: <931CD754-C401-4300-9CE0-8BFA81024B4F@amsl.com>
To: EDU Team <edu-team@ietf.org>
From: Mirjam Kuehne <mir@ripe.net>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <931CD754-C401-4300-9CE0-8BFA81024B4F@amsl.com>
Message-ID: <b015eb43-454f-8890-b807-0389d86d7af3@ripe.net>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 16:23:31 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <931CD754-C401-4300-9CE0-8BFA81024B4F@amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-ACL-Warn: Delaying message
X-RIPE-Spam-Level: ------
X-RIPE-Spam-Report: Spam Total Points: -6.4 points pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- ------------------------------------ -7.5 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP 1.1 URIBL_GREY Contains an URL listed in the URIBL greylist [URIs: surveymonkey.com]
X-RIPE-Signature: 7e0932718cf60c1d07d29cd25dae92749ad1fb06aef799b408a2dcda9169395d
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/edu-team/0EL3dLFqOHUDazKWbb3-V7KIlm0>
Subject: [edu-team] IETF 98 survey results & plans for IETF 99
X-BeenThere: edu-team@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Education Team <edu-team.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/edu-team>, <mailto:edu-team-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/edu-team/>
List-Post: <mailto:edu-team@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:edu-team-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-team>, <mailto:edu-team-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 14:28:57 -0000
Hi all, Alexa kindly sent the survey results for all our IETF 98 tutorials: Newcomers' Orientation: https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-BKS332SH/ Introduction to QUIC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-2DL5B2SH/ Security Considerations: https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-NM66H2SH/ Independent Stream: https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-BQF962SH/ Please also note the comments. For instance it was interesting to see that while people enjoyed the QUIC tutorial, they would like to see more in-depth technical information. Maybe this could be a follow-up tutorial? Do you have any other feedback for the IETF 98 tutorials? For IETF 99 in Prague, we have the following suggestions so far: - Newcomers (Mike St.Johns) - IRTF Overview (Allison Mankin) Allison couldn't do this in Chicago, but was happy to have this scheduled for Prague. - DPRIVE (Sara Dickinson) This tutorial was very well receives at IETF 97 in Seoul. I spoke to Sara in Chicago and she would be willing to do this again in Prague where we might be able to reach different people who were not in Seoul. - Presentation skills Some people suggested this could be useful. We did this once a long time ago. Maybe it is time again? - GitHub See the earlier discussion on this list. We had this topic as a WG chairs presentation at IETF 94. At the last IETF there was a BoF around that topic and also quite an extensive discussion at the WG chairs session. However, there seems to be some hesitation to open this up as a tutorial at this stage and if so we would need to clearly define the scope, goals etc. What do you think? Or did you hear any other suggestions? Kind regards, Mirjam
- [edu-team] IETF 98 survey results & plans for IET… Mirjam Kuehne