Re: [eppext] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-eppext-tmch-smd-04: (with COMMENT)

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Thu, 18 February 2016 13:22 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA80D1A6EE0; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 05:22:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yEu04OkcsYvq; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 05:22:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-x22b.google.com (mail-ig0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE9AB1A1B8A; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 05:22:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ig0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id g6so13383165igt.1; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 05:22:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=yOX/xlGqETzfmw74G8HJcDPpigXISwF31H5etLhQEs8=; b=WdKzHnycF/RtM6birESbioZPluu+Kc8GJH0/rLC/whM1bqZ1x/cNdZmrgVsy7qMEIm f4cs0tu64JkqDJId72jU3nQFbnHHCPLotZm+rgwYFwELISWqscwgjQNhljrtmDHkHEFH /GghOGxdS9f68yEUYzRDZpTgYnPkJpRiYBMPkY3XiZSvbhl3+kDPou2TZyE/UFUUZBpM D8Kjdu5w5U6TMDE4IKRFuHk1NV76TPptp1wndxb5PrWmOE+l86LFXCpC/tzbh3BO5DnX Zaq8ZXBJLYEp1SRu/SVqazxqdq3ePs6Ff85PHi9TsSDM6O6pddI+nvB0eoGd4wlv2QX/ rqEQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=yOX/xlGqETzfmw74G8HJcDPpigXISwF31H5etLhQEs8=; b=ICehcD+kta6pZcECAXIQlbOo4VMtvUblXv7GorEMIvZLI/rMaqT4cfhE43uWZzF6i/ QPhgcQ+hcujj7xAYQGGbknJ7bcgqG75hPj7AW86/meiaPviabD8g9t1Cr85PdsJnf/7y ja7JkV4Y/0zOqP96E/L9It198M/1OLr12wYPDSRm89arE7KCWqdu+RSplTC5iSuuwiS7 YD3l/c4OQil/sYIkLhLq9BFC/WFLvdzp2TVIpTz+FNQxPELGp8WG+oRUOTfdIGi2iHSJ pO6ba9iCYccsoKfqPr4XPWDN0TY0AU8fBxFqE21W3LnxNU1QgrGpLa+i2f9ulQsBRva1 sP+g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOR3z4bnWxMEAElnVGe4bDO54IUsKcw9gYffI2ytXi8oBZov+tYzs5wPjisnJSwy6DRihD4Cvxsvw1GwVQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.138.72 with SMTP id qo8mr3196380igb.81.1455801778272; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 05:22:58 -0800 (PST)
Sender: barryleiba@gmail.com
Received: by 10.36.156.5 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 05:22:58 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20160218073918.24465.37734.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20160218073918.24465.37734.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 05:22:58 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: ofd6qLfc9x-ar1Nn0iWga9o47sE
Message-ID: <CALaySJ+2-iqy7p2f=cwBhTot4AaMfXgmSdXjjdqW-gdn0vujnw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/9phQPIwydA7iCPbFWhqCRI9E61A>
Cc: tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, "nkong@cnnic.cn" <nkong@cnnic.cn>, draft-ietf-eppext-tmch-smd@ietf.org, eppext-chairs@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, eppext <eppext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [eppext] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-eppext-tmch-smd-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPPEXT <eppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eppext/>
List-Post: <mailto:eppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 13:23:00 -0000

> Specifically the Appendix in the wrong place

What Appendix?

> Additionally, in Section 2 "Object Description" there are elements for
> the objects that are marked OPTIONAL or MUST. However, there are many
> which are not defined either way.  The "assumption" is they are a MUST.
> If this is true perhaps some text at the beginning of the definitions
>
>     "Unless otherwise specified, any element defined is a MUST".

This second paragraph in Section 2 doesn't cover it?:

   This section defines some elements as OPTIONAL, the elements not
   defined as OPTIONAL are REQUIRED to be included in the appropriate
   objects.

-- 
Barry