Re: [eppext] WG Meeting at IETF-95?

Antoin Verschuren <ietf@antoin.nl> Tue, 02 February 2016 16:08 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@antoin.nl>
X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C90F1B2CDD for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 08:08:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.092
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.092 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q8FIGQ9YxFp1 for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 08:08:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from walhalla.antoin.nl (walhalla.antoin.nl [88.159.164.218]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 842DF1B2CC4 for <eppext@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 08:08:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.17] (541F474F.cm-5-8b.dynamic.ziggo.nl [84.31.71.79]) by walhalla.antoin.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 968F328017C for <eppext@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 17:08:21 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=antoin.nl; s=walhalla; t=1454429301; bh=/VXP3UqrckGz85uCLhG4twIYSTaEumJLaRcgT+yz314=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:References:To:From; b=M20gq0NWPSCul3VvLpWMzJXSH7jojgDfrxsKdRpA3p8aHBWzeN0qCTUb5qAOY0KNi lYGF+YWKcuounAB8D3neZ7+2CTGH+t01ixuh99k4y7Sz1Wc0lmQx0gzvOBfs8yYkNk xP+c0hp9aV9MM1EOuYCeEiHO03mxWy17LAxWJQic=
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_996D5E6B-A42E-4D60-9EAE-2DB38E36EA91"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.2
From: Antoin Verschuren <ietf@antoin.nl>
X-Priority: 1
In-Reply-To: <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4A14F898@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 17:08:14 +0100
Message-Id: <96A760E5-FCF9-4067-9BB7-D1EBB12D3AD5@antoin.nl>
References: <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4A14F898@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
To: "eppext@ietf.org" <eppext@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/LYtFZWArIvrbw1KYrwkGtr07ARA>
Subject: Re: [eppext] WG Meeting at IETF-95?
X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPPEXT <eppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eppext/>
List-Post: <mailto:eppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 16:08:24 -0000

Hi Scott, all.

Now that our charter is progressing, we intend to ask for a meeting slot in Buenos Aires.
Jim and I are teaming up next friday to discuss a possible agenda and request a meeting slot.
In the mean time, if people want to propose agenda items already, please let the chairs know.
We intend to request a 2 hour slot, and will solicit for speakers after next friday if none have volunteered.

- --
Antoin Verschuren

Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392






Op 2 feb. 2016, om 13:33 heeft Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenbeck@verisign.com>; het volgende geschreven:

> The cut-off for submitting WG meeting requests for IETF-95 is 19 February. The question has been asked more than once with no response - have our chairs submitted a meeting request? Do they intend to?
> 
> Scott
> 
> _______________________________________________
> EppExt mailing list
> EppExt@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext